Establishing detection thresholds for environmental DNA using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves

被引:0
作者
Natasha R. Serrao
Scott M. Reid
Chris C. Wilson
机构
[1] Trent University,Environmental and Life Sciences Graduate Program
[2] Trent University,Aquatic Research and Monitoring Section, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry
来源
Conservation Genetics Resources | 2018年 / 10卷
关键词
Environmental DNA (eDNA); Thresholds; False positives; False negatives; Receiver operator characteristic (ROC); Sensitivity; Specificity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection is increasingly being used to assess the potential presence of aquatic species. Setting defensible thresholds for qPCR assays are necessary to differentiate “detection” from “non-detection”, but threshold rationales are rarely reported in eDNA studies. Detection thresholds for data inclusion and exclusion have implications for downstream data analysis; uncritical acceptance could result in false positive results (Type I error), whereas overly conservative thresholds could result in high false negative interpretation (Type II error). We assessed the use of the receiver operator characteristics (ROC) framework to identify a detection threshold for balancing sensitivity and specificity of eDNA data. The ROC framework was tested using empirical eDNA data from redside dace (Clinostomus elongatus), an endangered freshwater fish in southwestern Ontario. Based on negative controls, positive controls, and quality assurance guidelines, a minimum concentration of 1 copy reaction−1 was identified as the most appropriate threshold for this study. Although optimal thresholds will likely vary between studies and labs based on empirical data, the ROC framework provides a statistical method for establishing defensible thresholds for data acceptance or rejection as well as tradeoffs between the sensitivity and specificity of eDNA data.
引用
收藏
页码:555 / 562
页数:7
相关论文
共 180 条
[1]  
Armbruster DA(2008)Limit of blank, limit of detection and limit of quantitation Clin Biochem Rev 29 S49-52
[2]  
Pry T(2004)Preventing PCR amplification carryover contamination in a clinical laboratory Ann Clin Lab Sci 34 389-396
[3]  
Aslanzadeh J(2016)Environmental DNA (eDNA) detection and habitat occupancy of threatened spotted gar ( Aquat Conserv 26 1107-1119
[4]  
Boothroyd M(2009)) Clin Chem 55 611-622
[5]  
Mandrak NE(2011)The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments J Vet Diagn Investig 23 2-15
[6]  
Fox M(1980)Selection of a cutoff value for real-time polymerase chain reaction results to fit a diagnostic purpose: analytical and epidemiologic approaches Cytometry 1 156-160
[7]  
Wilson CC(2011)The tradeoff of cell classifier error Environ Res 111 978-988
[8]  
Bustin SA(2015)From molecules to management: adopting DNA-based methods for monitoring biological invasions in aquatic environments Biol Conserv 183 53-63
[9]  
Benes V(2014)Choice of capture and extraction methods affect detection of freshwater biodiversity from environmental DNA Manage Biol Invasions 5 121-131
[10]  
Garson JA(2008)Development of molecular markers for eDNA detection of the invasive African jewelfish ( Arch Clin Neuropsychol 23 603-612