Family ownership and control as drivers for environmental, social, and governance in family firms

被引:0
作者
Jiamu Sun
Massimiliano Matteo Pellegrini
Marina Dabić
Kai Wang
Cizhi Wang
机构
[1] Beijing Jiatong University,School of Economics and Management
[2] Tor Vergata University,Department of Management and Law
[3] University of Zagreb,Faculty of Economics and Business
[4] University of Dubrovnik,School of Economics and Business
[5] University of Ljubljana,College of Business Administration
[6] Capital University of Economics and Business,undefined
来源
Review of Managerial Science | 2024年 / 18卷
关键词
ESG criteria; Family involvement; Family ownership; Family control; Socioemotional wealth theory;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sluggish market demand can deteriorate the financial situation of a company and affect a shareholder’s decision to adopt environmental, social, and governance criteria (ESG). According to the socioemotional wealth theory, family firms place significant emphasis on sustainable development and long-term orientation, but this emphasis can be either internally or externally driven according to the type of involvement chosen by the owning family. Therefore, this study uses listed family firms to explore the relationship between different types of family involvement (i.e., family ownership and control, the influence of market competition, and the institutionalisation level of the environment in which a firm decides to pursue ESG criteria). We performed a multivariate regression analysis on a sample of 1,151 Chinese companies to test these relationships and found that both family ownership and control are positively related to ESG scores. Market competition negatively moderates the influence of both family ownership and control on the adoption of ESG criteria. Moreover, the influence of family control is negatively moderated by the institutional environment. Thus, types of family involvement seem to be relevant for the firm’s engagement with ESG criteria.
引用
收藏
页码:1015 / 1046
页数:31
相关论文
共 227 条
[1]  
Ammann M(2013)Product market competition, corporate governance, and firm value: evidence from the EU area Eur Financ Manag 19 452-469
[2]  
Oesch D(2003)Founding-family ownership and firm performance: evidence from the S&P 500 J Financ 58 1301-1328
[3]  
Schmid MM(2021)Investors' carbon risk exposure and their potential for shareholder engagement Bus Strateg Environ 30 282-301
[4]  
Anderson RC(2012)Socioemotional wealth in family firms: theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research Fam Bus Rev 25 258-279
[5]  
Reeb DM(2022)Regional entrepreneurial ecosystems: how family firm embeddedness triggers ecosystem development Rev Manag Sci 16 15-44
[6]  
Benz L(2019)Hierarchical dyadic congruence in family firms: the interplay of supervisor and supervisee socioemotional wealth importance and familial status Entrep Theory Pract 43 322-329
[7]  
Paulus S(2021)Delineating the path of family firm innovation: mapping the scientific structure Rev Manag Sci 15 2455-2499
[8]  
Scherer J(2019)The intersection of nationalism, confucian familism, and queer in katherine hui-ling chou’s he’s my wife, he’s my mother Orbis Litterarium 74 365-379
[9]  
Syryca J(2011)Resource orchestration in family firms: investigating how entrepreneurial orientation, generational involvement, and participative strategy affect performance Strateg Entrep J 5 307-326
[10]  
Trück S(2012)Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms Entrep Theory Pract 36 267-293