Morphological and functional evaluation of normal and abnormal fetal growth by ultrasonography

被引:0
作者
Toshiyuki Yoshizato
Shoji Satoh
机构
[1] Fukuoka University Hospital,Center for Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
[2] Oita Prefectural Hospital,Maternity and Perinatal Care Center
来源
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics | 2009年 / 36卷
关键词
Fetal biometry; Fetal growth; Intrauterine growth restriction; Macrosomia; Ultrasonography; Doppler velocimetry;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Correction or estimation of gestational age is essential for the evaluation of fetal growth. When necessary, an appropriate fetal biometric parameter should be selected depending on fetal size. In the first trimester, crown–rump length (CRL) is appropriate, especially when the CRL is 20–40 mm. In the second trimester, biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), and femur length (FL) are of equal predictability. Fetal weight estimation is still the basis of evaluation of fetal growth. The most predictable formula currently available includes the parameters BPD (or HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and FL. Serial measurements of AC are useful for diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and macrosomia. Quantitative evaluation of soft tissue deposition may be informative for macrosomia. Functional evaluation using Doppler velocimetry is essential in IUGR cases associated with uteroplacental insufficiency. Analysis of blood velocity waveforms of the umbilical and intracranial arteries, predominantly the middle cerebral artery, is widely performed. An increase in the pulsatility index (PI) or resistance index (RI) of the umbilical artery and/or a decrease in the PI or RI of the middle cerebral artery are highly predictable for fetal hypoxia and/or acidosis.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 117
页数:12
相关论文
共 286 条
  • [1] Queenan JT(1980)Ultrasound scanning of ovaries to detect ovulation in women Fertil Steril 34 99-105
  • [2] O’Brien GD(2000)Gestational age in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization: a comparison between age assessed from oocyte retrieval. Crown–rump length and biparietal diameter Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 15 41-46
  • [3] Bains LM(1973)Sonar measurement of fetal crown–rump length as means of assessing maturity in first trimester of pregnancy Br Med J 4 28-31
  • [4] Simpson J(1975)A critical evaluation of sonar ‘crown–rump length’ measurements Br J Obstet Gynaecol 82 702-710
  • [5] Collins WP(1982)Fetal crown–rump length measurement by ultrasound in normal pregnancy Br J Obstet Gynaecol 89 926-930
  • [6] Campbell S(1992)Fetal crown–rump length: reevaluation of relation to menstrual age (5–18 weeks) with high-resolution real-time US Radiology 182 501-505
  • [7] Tunon K(1995)Crown–rump length in chromosomally abnormal fetuses at 10 to 13 weeks’ gestation Am J Obstet Gynecol 172 32-35
  • [8] Eik-Nes SH(1981)Early fetal growth delay detected by ultrasound marks increased risk of congenital malformation in diabetic pregnancy Br Med J 283 269-271
  • [9] Grottum P(1991)Sonographic prediction of gestational age: accuracy of second- and third-trimester fetal measurements AJR 157 1275-1277
  • [10] During VV(1975)Ultrasonic measurement of fetal abdomen circumference in the estimation of fetal weight Br J Obstet Gynaecol 82 689-697