Consumer self-reported and testosterone responses to advertising of luxury goods in social context

被引:0
作者
Rumen Pozharliev
Willem Verbeke
Matteo De Angelis
Ruud Van Den Bos
Paolo Peverini
机构
[1] LUISS Guido Carli, Viale Romania, 32, Rome
[2] Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, P.O. Box 1738, Rotterdam
[3] Radboud University, Comeniuslaan 4, Nijmegen
关键词
Advertising; Luxury goods; Reward experience; Social status; Testosterone;
D O I
10.1007/s43039-021-00023-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Despite the growing demand for luxury goods, there is limited understanding about how consumers respond to luxury-goods advertising and how viewing advertising in different social contexts affects these responses. This study investigates the link between luxury goods advertising and expected utility from a biological perspective by looking at males’ hormonal responses to advertising of luxury versus non-luxury branded goods. Using traditional and consumer neuroscience methods, we collected salivary testosterone data pre- and post-ad viewing. Self-reported scores on social and quality value of the brands were compared to salivary testosterone levels from participants placed in different social conditions (Alone versus Together with another person). The results show that higher post-viewing testosterone levels were associated with higher scores on quality, but not on social value and only for branded goods viewed in the Together condition, compared to the Alone condition. These results suggest that changes in testosterone levels reflect a rewarding experience or activate social competitiveness when male consumers appraise the quality but not the social value of the advertised luxury goods and that social context modulates this effect. © The Author(s) 2021.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 127
页数:24
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Aaker D.A., Managing brand equity, (2009)
  • [2] Akitsuki Y., Decety J., Social context and perceived agency affects empathy for pain: An event-related fMRI investigation, NeuroImage, 47, 2, pp. 722-734, (2009)
  • [3] Amatulli C., De Angelis M., Donato C., An investigation on the effectiveness of hedonic versus utilitarian message appeals in luxury product communication, Psychology & Marketing, 37, 4, pp. 523-534, (2020)
  • [4] Amatulli C., De Angelis M., Pichierri M., Guido G., The importance of dream in advertising: Luxury versus mass market, International Journal of Marketing Studies, 10, 1, pp. 71-81, (2018)
  • [5] Archer J., Testosterone and human aggression: An evaluation of the challenge hypothesis, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 3, pp. 319-345, (2006)
  • [6] Argo J.J., Dahl D.W., Manchanda R.V., The influence of a mere social presence in a retail context, Journal of Consumer Research, 32, 2, pp. 207-212, (2005)
  • [7] Ariely D., Levav J., Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed, Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 3, pp. 279-290, (2000)
  • [8] Arnold M.J., Reynolds K.E., Hedonic shopping motivations, Journal of Retailing, 79, 2, pp. 77-95, (2003)
  • [9] Atwal G., Williams A., Luxury brand marketing–the experience is everything!, Journal of Brand Management, 16, 5-6, pp. 338-346, (2009)
  • [10] Bagozzi R.P., Lee N., Philosophical foundations of neuroscience in organizational research: Functional and nonfunctional approaches, Organizational Research Methods, (2019)