Access to justice through lenses of vulnerability and equality: a dialogue between philosophy and law

被引:0
作者
Matiaško M. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] University of Palacky, Olomouc
[2] Essex University, Colchester
[3] Forum for Human Rights, Prague
关键词
Access to justice; Emmanuel Lévinas; Equality; Philosophy; Reasonable accommodation; Vulnerability;
D O I
10.1007/s12027-021-00696-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article aims to defend the proposition that the right to access justice is based on the duality of the general and particular. This means that, in principle, no one can be excluded from the enjoyment of this right, and at the same time, procedural arrangements must be in place so that anyone can effectively exercise this right. The article is primarily theoretical and offers discussion on the background of two concepts, namely equality and vulnerability. Despite its speculative nature, the considerations have practical implications as they suggest a way of thinking about the right of access to justice in practice, including objections to possible violations of this right. © 2022, ERA.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 727
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Barbaras R., Finitude et vulnérabilité, Vulnérabilité et Empathie. Approches phénoménologiques, (2018)
  • [2] Bauman Z., Liquid Modernity, (2000)
  • [3] Bernasconi R., What is the question to which ‘substitution’ is the answer?, Cambridge Companion to Levinas, (2002)
  • [4] Burggraeve R., The Wisdom of Love in the Service of Love. Emmanuel Levinas on Justice, Peace, and Human Rights, (2007)
  • [5] Butler J., Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence, (2004)
  • [6] Butler J., Giving an Account of Oneself, (2005)
  • [7] Butler J., Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable?, (2009)
  • [8] Butler J., The Force of Nonviolence: An Ethico-Political Bind, (2021)
  • [9] Cavarero A., Horrorism: Naming Contemporary Violence, (2009)
  • [10] Cavarero A., Inclinations: A Critique of Rectitude, (2016)