Psychometric Properties of the Farsi Version of Hoge Intrinsic Religiosity Scale in Muslims: A Brief Report

被引:9
作者
Hafizi S. [1 ]
Koenig H.G. [2 ,3 ]
Khalifa D.A. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, No 7, Al-e-Ahmad Highway, P.O Box: 14395-578, Tehran
[2] Center for Spirituality, Theology and Health, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
[3] Department of Psychiatry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah
[4] Ain Shams University, Cairo
关键词
Intrinsic religiosity; Reliability; Spirituality; Validity;
D O I
10.1007/s11089-015-0648-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Over the past decade, researchers have paid increased attention to the relationship between religion and health. Although interest in research on religion and health in Iran is just beginning, it is growing rapidly. Despite the expanding research in this field and the need for cross-cultural validation of religion measures, few measures in Farsi, the official language of Iran, have been validated. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Farsi version of the Hoge Intrinsic Religiosity Scale (Hoge IR Scale). The translation of the Hoge IR Scale into Farsi used a standard forward-backward translation method. This study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, 573 medical students and physicians were administered the Hoge IR Scale along with the Duke University Religion Index (DUREL). In the second phase, 147 nurses filled out the Hoge IR Scale. Reliability of the measure was tested by internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, or ICC). Factor structure of the measure was assessed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Concurrent validity was tested using correlation with DUREL total score. The Farsi version of the Hoge IR Scale has high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor solution for the Hoge IR Scale in the Phase I sample. Confirmatory factor analysis supported the two-factor model. We concluded that the Farsi version of the Hoge IR Scale is a reliable and valid measure of religiosity and may be used in clinical and research settings among Farsi-speaking populations. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:839 / 845
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Abdel-Khalek A.M., Assessment of intrinsic religiosity with a single-item measure in a sample of Arab Muslims, Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 2, 2, pp. 211-215, (2007)
[2]  
Abdel-Khalek A.M., Religiosity, happiness, health, and psychopathology in a probability sample of Muslim adolescents, Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 10, 6, pp. 571-583, (2007)
[3]  
Abdel-Khalek A.M., Quality of life, subjective well-being, and religiosity in Muslim college students, Quality of Life Research, 19, 8, pp. 1133-1143, (2010)
[4]  
Abdel-Khalek A.M., Personality dimensions and religiosity among Kuwaiti Muslim college students, Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 2, pp. 149-152, (2013)
[5]  
Allport G.W., Ross J.M., Personal religious orientation and prejudice, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 4, (1967)
[6]  
Dein S., Cook C.C., Koenig H., Religion, spirituality, and mental health: current controversies and future directions, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 200, 10, pp. 852-855, (2012)
[7]  
Hafizi S., Memari A.H., Pakrah M., Mohebi F., Saghazadeh A., Koenig H.G., The Duke University Religion Index (DUREL): validation and reliability of the Farsi version, Psychological Reports, 112, 1, pp. 151-159, (2013)
[8]  
Hafizi S., Koenig H.G., Arbabi M., Pakrah M., Saghazadeh A., Attitudes of Muslim physicians and nurses toward religious issues, Journal of Religion and Health, 53, 5, pp. 1374-1381, (2014)
[9]  
Hafizi S., Rosmarin D.H., Koenig H.G., Brief trust/mistrust in God scale: psychometric properties of the Farsi version in Muslims, Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 17, 4, pp. 415-420, (2014)
[10]  
Hoge R., A validated intrinsic religious motivation scale, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 11, 4, pp. 369-376, (1972)