HiBiT-qIP, HiBiT-based quantitative immunoprecipitation, facilitates the determination of antibody affinity under immunoprecipitation conditions

被引:0
作者
Deshani C. Ranawakage
Takuya Takada
Yusuke Kamachi
机构
[1] Kochi University of Technology,School of Environmental Science and Engineering
[2] Osaka University 1–3 Yamadaoka,Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences
来源
Scientific Reports | / 9卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The affinity of an antibody for its antigen serves as a critical parameter for antibody evaluation. The evaluation of antibody-antigen affinity is essential for a successful antibody-based assay, particularly immunoprecipitation (IP), due to its strict dependency on antibody performance. However, the determination of antibody affinity or its quantitative determinant, the dissociation constant (Kd), under IP conditions is difficult. In the current study, we used a NanoLuc-based HiBiT system to establish a HiBiT-based quantitative immunoprecipitation (HiBiT-qIP) assay for determining the Kd of antigen-antibody interactions in solution. The HiBiT-qIP method measures the amount of immunoprecipitated proteins tagged with HiBiT in a simple yet quantitative manner. We used this method to measure the Kd values of epitope tag-antibody interactions. To accomplish this, FLAG, HA, V5, PA and Ty1 epitope tags in their monomeric, dimeric or trimeric form were fused with glutathione S-transferase (GST) and the HiBiT peptide, and these tagged GST proteins were mixed with cognate monoclonal antibodies in IP buffer for the assessment of the apparent Kd values. This HiBiT-qIP assay showed a considerable variation in the Kd values among the examined antibody clones. Additionally, the use of epitope tags in multimeric form revealed a copy number-dependent increase in the apparent affinity.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 139 条
[1]  
Bordeaux J(2010)Antibody validation Biotechniques 48 197-209
[2]  
Egelhofer TA(2011)An assessment of histone-modification antibody quality Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18 91-93
[3]  
Weller MG(2018)Ten basic rules of antibody validation Anal. Chem. Insights 13 1-5
[4]  
Reiss PD(2014)Working towards a consensus for antibody validation F1000Research 3 1-3
[5]  
Min D(2017)The ABCs of finding a good antibody: How to find a good antibody, validate it, and publish meaningful data F1000Research 6 1-14
[6]  
Leung MY(2015)A ChIP on the shoulder? Chromatin immunoprecipitation and validation strategies for ChIP antibodies F1000Research 4 1-10
[7]  
Acharya P(2011)ChIP-Seq: technical considerations for obtaining high-quality data Nat. Immunol. 12 918-922
[8]  
Quinlan A(1985)Measurements of the true affinity constant in solution of antigen-antibody complexes by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay J. Immunol. Methods 77 305-319
[9]  
Neumeister V(2000)Kinetic, equilibrium, and thermodynamic analysis of macromolecular interactions with BIACORE in Methods in Enzymology 323 325-340
[10]  
Wardle FC(1996)Biophysical methods for the determination of antibody-antigen affinities Trends Biotechnol. 14 465-470