On the moral responsibility of military robots

被引:2
作者
Thomas Hellström
机构
[1] Umeå University,Department of Computing Science
来源
Ethics and Information Technology | 2013年 / 15卷
关键词
Moral responsibility; Robots; Military robots; Autonomy; Robot ethics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article discusses mechanisms and principles for assignment of moral responsibility to intelligent robots, with special focus on military robots. We introduce the concept autonomous power as a new concept, and use it to identify the type of robots that call for moral considerations. It is furthermore argued that autonomous power, and in particular the ability to learn, is decisive for assignment of moral responsibility to robots. As technological development will lead to robots with increasing autonomous power, we should be prepared for a future when people blame robots for their actions. It is important to, already today, investigate the mechanisms that control human behavior in this respect. The results may be used when designing future military robots, to control unwanted tendencies to assign responsibility to the robots. Independent of the responsibility issue, the moral quality of robots’ behavior should be seen as one of many performance measures by which we evaluate robots. How to design ethics based control systems should be carefully investigated already now. From a consequentialist view, it would indeed be highly immoral to develop robots capable of performing acts involving life and death, without including some kind of moral framework.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 107
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Arkin R. C.(2009b)Ethical robots in warfare IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 28 30-33
  • [2] Bechtel W(1985)Attributing responsibility to computer systems Metaphilosophy 16 296-306
  • [3] Grossman N.(2007)Rehabilitation or revenge: Prosecuting child soldiers for human rights violations Georgetown Journal of International Law 38 323-362
  • [4] Hinds P(2004)Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task Human-Computer Interaction 19 151-181
  • [5] Roberts T(2006)Computer systems: Moral entities but not moral agents Ethics and Information Technology 8 195-204
  • [6] Jones H(2004)The responsibility gap: Ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata Ethics and Information Technology 6 175-183
  • [7] Johnson DG(2011)Moral responsibility for computing artifacts: “The rules” IT Professional 13 57-59
  • [8] Matthias A(1998)Are computers scapegoats? Attributions of responsibility in human-computer interaction International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 49 79-94
  • [9] Miller KW(2000)A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, & Cybernetics 30 286-297
  • [10] Moon Y(2007)Killer robots Journal of Applied Philosophy 24 62-77