Patients' preferences in therapeutic decision-making in digestive oncology: a single centre cross-sectional observational study

被引:0
作者
Pierre Nizet
Charlotte Grivel
Pauline Rabeau
Solange Pecout
Adrien Evin
Sonia Prot Labarthe
Dominique Navas
Fanny Feuillet
Marianne Bourdon
Jean-François Huon
机构
[1] Nantes Université,UMR INSERM 1246 SPHERE “methodS in Patient
[2] CHU Nantes,Centered Outcomes and HEalth ResEarch”
[3] Pharmacie,Nantes Université, CHU Nantes
[4] Nantes Université,Nantes Université, CHU Nantes
[5] Université de Tours,undefined
[6] Institut Des Maladies De l’Appareil Digestif,undefined
[7] Service de Soins Palliatifs et de Support,undefined
[8] Université Paris Cité,undefined
[9] INSERM,undefined
[10] ECEVE,undefined
[11] Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 13卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Considering the preferences in Shared Decision Making (SDM) of patients with Digestive Cancer (DC) is crucial to ensure the quality of care. To date, there is limited information on preferences in SDM of patients with DC. The objectives of this study were to describe digestive cancer patients’ preference for involvement in therapeutic decision-making and to identify variables associated with these preferences. An observational prospective study in a French university cancer center has been conducted. Patients completed two questionnaires to qualify and quantify their preference for involvement in therapeutic decision-making: the Control Preference Scale (CPS) and the Autonomy Preference Index (API), which is composed of the Decision Making (DM) score and the Information Seeking (IS) score. Associations between these scores and socio-demographic data, disease-related data, coping strategies (Brief-COPE), physical (QLQ-C30) and psychological (HADS) quality of life were tested. One-hundred fifteen patients returned the questionnaires. The majority of patients reported a passive (49.1%) or a collaborative (43.0%) CPS status. The mean DM score was 39.4 Variables associated with decision-making preferences were occupational status and time since diagnosis. The identification of variables associated with patients' preferences for involvement in decision-making can help make clinicians aware of patients' needs and wishes. However, it can only be determined by interviewing the patient individually.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 218 条
  • [1] Wan T(2019)The prognostic value of a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant therapy for digestive cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 studies Ann. Surg. Oncol. 26 1412-1420
  • [2] Zhang XF(2022)Cancer statistics, 2022 CA Cancer J. Clin. 72 7-33
  • [3] Liang C(2007)Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: Elderly cancer patients’ preferences and their physicians’ perceptions J. Clin. Oncol. 25 5275-5280
  • [4] Liao CW(2019)Quality of life versus length of life considerations in cancer patients: A systematic literature review Psychooncology. 28 1367-1380
  • [5] Li JY(2022)Shared decision making in cancer treatment: A Dutch national survey on patients’ preferences and perceptions Eur. J. Cancer Care (Engl) 31 e13534-781
  • [6] Zhou YM(2012)Shared decision making–pinnacle of patient-centered care N. Engl. J. Med. 366 780-312
  • [7] Siegel RL(2006)An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters Patient Educ. Couns. 60 301-1367
  • [8] Miller KD(2012)Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice J. Gen. Intern. Med. 27 1361-1179
  • [9] Fuchs HE(2015)Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice Patient Educ. Couns. 98 1172-1048
  • [10] Jemal A(2015)Does shared decision making in cancer treatment improve quality of life? A systematic literature review Med. Decis. Mak. Int. J. Soc. Med. Decis. Mak. 35 1037-580