Nuclear imaging of neuroendocrine tumors with unknown primary: why, when and how?

被引:0
作者
Prasanna Santhanam
Sangeeta Chandramahanti
Alexander Kroiss
Run Yu
Philippe Ruszniewski
Rakesh Kumar
David Taïeb
机构
[1] Marshall University,Section of Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine
[2] Medical University Innsbruck,Department of Nuclear Medicine
[3] Cedars-Sinai Medical Center,Division of Endocrinology and Carcinoid and Neuroendocrine Tumor Center
[4] Beaujon Hospital and Paris-Diderot University,Department of Gastroenterology
[5] All India Institute of Medical Sciences,Pancreatology
[6] Aix-Marseille University,Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine Division, Department of Nuclear Medicine
[7] Institut Paoli-Calmettes,Department of Nuclear Medicine, La Timone University Hospital
[8] Aix-Marseille University,Inserm UMR1068 Marseille Cancerology Research Center
来源
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | 2015年 / 42卷
关键词
Neuroendocrine tumors; Positron emission tomography; Gallium radioisotopes; Somatostatin; F-DOPA;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with unknown primary (CUP-NET) are associated with a poor prognosis (10-year survival 22 %), grade 1 and 2 NETs having a more favorable outcome than grade 3 (also called carcinoma). There is evidence that an effort should be made to localize the primary tumor even in the presence of metastasis because resection of the primary tumor(s) may improve disease-free and overall survival, and because the choice of chemotherapeutic agent depends on the location of the primary tumor. Localization of the tumors remains challenging and often relies on a combination of radiological, endoscopic and functional imaging. The functional imaging protocol for evaluation of these patients has historically relied on somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS). However, the sensitivity and specificity of SRS may be unsatisfactory, especially for NETs of midgut origin. Newer PET radiotracers such as 68Ga-labeled somatostatin analogs (68Ga-DOTA-SSTa) and 18F-DOPA have shown promise. In direct comparisons between 68Ga-DOTA-SSTa PET/CT and 99mTc-HYNIC-octreotide/111In-pentetreotide SPECT(/CT), 68Ga-DOTA-SSTa performed better than other techniques, giving a compelling reason for switching from SPECT/CT to PET/CT imaging. 18F-DOPA performs better than SRS and CT in well-differentiated NETs of the small intestine. For detecting pancreatic NETs, the high background uptake of 18F-DOPA by the normal exocrine pancreas can be somewhat overcome by pretreatment with carbidopa. We have suggested a protocol in which SRS is replaced by one of the two agents (preferably with 68Ga-DOTA-SSTa, alternatively 18F-DOPA) as first-line nuclear tracer for detection of CUP-NET in patients with well-differentiated NETs and 18F-FDG PET/CT may be an additional diagnostic test for poorly differentiated tumors and for prognostication. In the near future, it is expected that patients with CUP-NET will benefit from newly developed PET approaches (radiopharmaceuticals) and intraoperative PET imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:1144 / 1155
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The future of nuclear medicine imaging of neuroendocrine tumors: on a clear day one might see forever ...
    Bodei, Lisa
    Kidd, Mark
    Prasad, Vikas
    Baum, Richard P.
    Drozdov, Ignat
    Modlin, Irvin M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2014, 41 (12) : 2189 - 2193
  • [42] ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Radiological, Nuclear Medicine and Hybrid Imaging
    Sundin, Anders
    Arnold, Rudolf
    Baudin, Eric
    Cwikla, Jaroslaw B.
    Eriksson, Barbro
    Fanti, Stefano
    Fazio, Nicola
    Giammarile, Francesco
    Hicks, Rodney J.
    Kjaer, Andreas
    Krenning, Eric
    Kwekkeboom, Dik
    Lombard-Bohas, Catherine
    O'Connor, Juan M.
    O'Toole, Dermot
    Rockall, Andrea
    Wiedenmann, Bertram
    Valle, Juan W.
    Vullierme, Marie-Pierre
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2017, 105 (03) : 212 - 244
  • [43] Second primary malignancies in patients with neuroendocrine tumors
    Reina, J. J.
    Serrano, R.
    Codes, M.
    Jimenez, E.
    Bolanos, M.
    Gonzalez, E.
    Sevilla, I.
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 16 (10) : 921 - 926
  • [44] Second primary malignancies in patients with neuroendocrine tumors
    J. J. Reina
    R. Serrano
    M. Codes
    E. Jiménez
    M. Bolaños
    E. Gonzalez
    I. Sevilla
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2014, 16 : 921 - 926
  • [45] Biomarkers and Molecular Imaging in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
    Lindholm, D. P.
    Oberg, K.
    HORMONE AND METABOLIC RESEARCH, 2011, 43 (12) : 832 - 837
  • [46] NEUROENDOCRINE TUMORS: CHOOSING APPROPRIATE IMAGING METHODS
    Gheorghe, Liliana
    Jari, Irina
    Ursaru, Manuela
    Negru, D.
    Stefanescu, Cipriana
    Naum, A.
    MEDICAL-SURGICAL JOURNAL-REVISTA MEDICO-CHIRURGICALA, 2018, 122 (01): : 16 - 22
  • [47] Molecular imaging and radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors
    Haider, Mintallah
    Al-Toubah, Taymeyah
    El-Haddad, Ghassan
    Strosberg, Jonathan
    CURRENT OPINION IN ENDOCRINOLOGY DIABETES AND OBESITY, 2020, 27 (01) : 16 - 21
  • [48] Primary and secondary hepatic manifestation of neuroendocrine tumors
    Pascher, A
    Steinmüller, T
    Radke, C
    Hosten, N
    Wiedenmann, B
    Neuhaus, P
    Bechstein, WO
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2000, 385 (04) : 265 - 270
  • [49] The radionuclide molecular imaging and therapy of neuroendocrine tumors
    Li, SR
    Beheshti, M
    CURRENT CANCER DRUG TARGETS, 2005, 5 (02) : 139 - 148
  • [50] Endoscopic imaging in the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Pellicano, Rinaldo
    Fagoonee, Sharmila
    Altruda, Fiorella
    Bruno, Mauro
    Saracco, Giorgio M.
    De Angelis, Claudio
    MINERVA ENDOCRINOLOGICA, 2016, 41 (04) : 490 - 498