Psychometric Validation of the Female Sexual Distress Scale in Male Samples

被引:0
作者
Pablo Santos-Iglesias
Bijan Mohamed
Angela Danko
Lauren M. Walker
机构
[1] University of Calgary,Department of Oncology
[2] University of Calgary,Department of Psychology
[3] Psychosocial Resources,undefined
[4] Tom Baker Cancer Centre,undefined
来源
Archives of Sexual Behavior | 2018年 / 47卷
关键词
Sexual distress; Sexual function; Sexual Distress Scale; Sexual dysfunction; DSM-5;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This manuscript is the first to examine the psychometric properties of the Female Sexual Distress Scale in samples of sexually functional and dysfunctional men, herein called the Sexual Distress Scale (SDS). A sample of 127 sexually dysfunctional men and 267 sexually functional men completed an online survey that included a sociodemographic questionnaire, a health questionnaire, the SDS, as well as measures of sexual bother and concerns, sexual function, sexual attitudes, and mood states. We also used a sample of 188 sexually dysfunctional and 155 sexually functional women from previous studies. Results showed that the SDS assesses one general domain of sexual distress. The factor structure was invariant across gender and sexual function status. The SDS also showed good content, construct, and criterion validity, as well as good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) and test–retest reliability. Finally, the SDS discriminated well between sexually functional and sexually dysfunctional men. These results show that the SDS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing sexual distress in men. This instrument can be used by researchers and clinicians to examine sexual distress and can be used to elucidate how sexual distress relates to sexual function, well-being and quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:1733 / 1743
页数:10
相关论文
共 155 条
[31]  
Andrykowski MA(2012)lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling Journal of Statistical Software 48 1-306
[32]  
Studts JL(1983)A shortened version of the Profile of Mood States Journal of Personality Assessment 47 305-978
[33]  
Dennerstein L(2008)Sexual problems and distress in United States women Obstetrics and Gynecology 112 970-2468
[34]  
Guthrie KA(2010)Differentiating components of sexual well-being in women: Are sexual satisfaction and sexual distress independent constructs? Journal of Sexual Medicine 7 2458-3694
[35]  
Hayes RD(2010)When are sexual difficulties distressing for women? The selective protective value of intimate relationships Journal of Sexual Medicine 7 3683-304
[36]  
Derogatis L(2006)The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): Psychometric properties within a Dutch population Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy 32 289-195
[37]  
Lehert P(1998)Volunteer bias, sexuality, and personality Archives of Sexual Behavior 27 181-905
[38]  
Derogatis L(2000)Development and validation of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer Urology 56 899-26
[39]  
Derogatis L(2007)Decoding the meaning of factorial invariance and updating the practice of multi-group confirmatory factor analysis: A demonstration with TIMSS data Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 12 1-undefined
[40]  
Clayton A(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined