Psychometric Validation of the Female Sexual Distress Scale in Male Samples

被引:0
作者
Pablo Santos-Iglesias
Bijan Mohamed
Angela Danko
Lauren M. Walker
机构
[1] University of Calgary,Department of Oncology
[2] University of Calgary,Department of Psychology
[3] Psychosocial Resources,undefined
[4] Tom Baker Cancer Centre,undefined
来源
Archives of Sexual Behavior | 2018年 / 47卷
关键词
Sexual distress; Sexual function; Sexual Distress Scale; Sexual dysfunction; DSM-5;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This manuscript is the first to examine the psychometric properties of the Female Sexual Distress Scale in samples of sexually functional and dysfunctional men, herein called the Sexual Distress Scale (SDS). A sample of 127 sexually dysfunctional men and 267 sexually functional men completed an online survey that included a sociodemographic questionnaire, a health questionnaire, the SDS, as well as measures of sexual bother and concerns, sexual function, sexual attitudes, and mood states. We also used a sample of 188 sexually dysfunctional and 155 sexually functional women from previous studies. Results showed that the SDS assesses one general domain of sexual distress. The factor structure was invariant across gender and sexual function status. The SDS also showed good content, construct, and criterion validity, as well as good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha) and test–retest reliability. Finally, the SDS discriminated well between sexually functional and sexually dysfunctional men. These results show that the SDS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing sexual distress in men. This instrument can be used by researchers and clinicians to examine sexual distress and can be used to elucidate how sexual distress relates to sexual function, well-being and quality of life.
引用
收藏
页码:1733 / 1743
页数:10
相关论文
共 155 条
  • [1] Azimi Nekoo E(2015)Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised in women Journal of Sexual Medicine 11 995-1004
  • [2] Burri A(2003)Distress about sex: A national survey of women in heterosexual relationships Archives of Sexual Behavior 32 193-208
  • [3] Ashrafti F(2000)Report of the international consensus development conference on female sexual dysfunction: definitions and classifications Journal of Urology 163 888-893
  • [4] Fridlund B(2015)Asexuality: An extreme variant of sexual desire disorder? Journal of Sexual Medicine 12 646-660
  • [5] Koenig HG(2002)Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance Structural Equation Modeling 9 235-255
  • [6] Derogatis LR(2014)A comparison of cognitive-behavioral couple therapy and lidocaine in the treatment of provoked vestibulodynia: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial Trials 15 506-83
  • [7] Pakpour AH(1995)Short form of the Profile of Mood States (POMS-SF): Psychometric information Psychological Assessment 7 80-2299
  • [8] Bancroft J(2008)Sexual function, dysfunction and sexual distress in a prospective, population-based sample of mid-aged, Australian-born women Journal of Sexual Medicine 5 2291-44
  • [9] Loftus J(2008)Assessment of sexual function/dysfunction via patient reported outcomes International Journal of Impotence Research 20 35-364
  • [10] Long JS(2008)Validation of the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised for assessing distress in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder Journal of Sexual Medicine 5 357-2815