Research priorities for measuring biologic age: summary and future directions from the Research Centers Collaborative Network Workshop

被引:0
作者
Tina E. Brinkley
Jamie N. Justice
Shubhashrita Basu
Scott R. Bauer
Kah Poh Loh
Peter Mukli
Ted Kheng Siang Ng
Indira C. Turney
Luigi Ferrucci
Steven R. Cummings
Stephen B. Kritchevsky
机构
[1] Wake Forest University School of Medicine,Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
[2] University of Wisconsin,Center for Demography of Health and Aging
[3] University of California and San Francisco VA Medical Center,Departments of Medicine and Urology
[4] University of Rochester Medical Center,Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine
[5] James P. Wilmot Cancer Institute,Department of Biochemistry/Molecular Biology
[6] University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center,Department of Neurology
[7] Edson College of Nursing and Health Innovation,undefined
[8] Arizona State University,undefined
[9] Columbia University Medical Center,undefined
[10] Intramural Research Program of the National Institute On Aging,undefined
[11] NIH,undefined
[12] San Francisco Coordinating Center,undefined
[13] California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute and the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics,undefined
[14] University of California,undefined
来源
GeroScience | 2022年 / 44卷
关键词
Biologic age; Aging; Epigenetics; Clinical trials; Multidisciplinary studies;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Biologic aging reflects the genetic, molecular, and cellular changes underlying the development of morbidity and mortality with advancing chronological age. As several potential mechanisms have been identified, there is a growing interest in developing robust measures of biologic age that can better reflect the underlying biology of aging and predict age-related outcomes. To support this endeavor, the Research Centers Collaborative Network (RCCN) conducted a workshop in January 2022 to discuss emerging concepts in the field and identify opportunities to move the science forward. This paper presents workshop proceedings and summarizes the identified research needs, priorities, and recommendations for measuring biologic age. The highest priorities identified were the need for more robust measures, longitudinal studies, multidisciplinary collaborations, and translational approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:2573 / 2583
页数:10
相关论文
共 271 条
[1]  
Crimmins E(2010)Biodemography: new approaches to understanding trends and differences in population health and mortality Demography 47 S41-64
[2]  
Kim JK(2021)Asynchronous, contagious and digital aging Nat Aging 1 29-35
[3]  
Vasunilashorn S(2015)Synchronized age-related gene expression changes across multiple tissues in human and the link to complex diseases Sci Rep 5 15145-E4110
[4]  
Rando TA(2015)Quantification of biologic aging in young adults Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112 E4104-1217
[5]  
Wyss-Coray T(2013)The hallmarks of aging Cell 153 1194-972
[6]  
Yang J(2013)Cellular senescence and the senescent secretory phenotype: therapeutic opportunities J Clin Invest 123 966-522
[7]  
Huang T(2012)Hallmarks of human "immunosenescence": adaptation or dysregulation? Immun Ageing 9 15-367
[8]  
Petralia F(2018)Inflammageing: chronic inflammation in ageing, cardiovascular disease, and frailty Nat Rev Cardiol 15 505-1201
[9]  
Long Q(2013)DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types Genome Biol 14 R115-19.e17
[10]  
Zhang B(2013)Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates Mol Cell 49 359-1850