Effect of Cesarean Section on the Severity of Postpartum Hemorrhage in Chinese Women: The Shanxi Study

被引:0
作者
Chang Xu
Qiang Fu
Hong-bing Tao
Xiao-jun Lin
Man-li Wang
Shu-xu Xia
Hao-ling Xiong
机构
[1] Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Department of Health Administration, School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College
[2] Saint Louis University,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, College for Public Health and Social Justice
来源
Current Medical Science | 2018年 / 38卷
关键词
postpartum hemorrhage; cesarean section; parity; indications;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is one of the most adverse obstetric outcomes. Our aim is to detect the risks of multilevel PPH in different cesarean section (CS) groups [including nulliparous CS with indications, nulliparous CS without indications, repeat cesarean (RC), vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC), cesarean after vaginal birth (CAVB)]. We conducted a retrospective cohort study, and the data on 127 145 women collected from January 2014 to May 2016 and from 35 tertiary hospitals in Shanxi province, China, were reviewed. Based on the measuring results of PPH, an ordered logistic regression model was used to analyze the adjusted PPH risks for each of the CS groups, and comparisons were drawn between them. Finally, a total of 99 066 nulliparous (77.92%) and 28 079 multiparous (22.08%) women were observed. The number of CS cases was 61 117, and the rate for CS was 48.07%. A total of 10 029 women did not show indications for CS and accounted for 16.41% of the CS parturient, whereas 9103 women underwent a repeated cesarean, with a CS frequency of 14.89%. The number of VBAC cases was 989, whose rate was 9.88% in prior CS women. The number (proportions) of PPH was 3658 (2.88%) in LI (PPH volume: ≥900 and <1500 mL), 520 (0.41%) in 12 (PPH volume: >1500 and <2100 mL), and 201 (0.16%) in L3 (PPH volume: ≥2100 mL). The Ln (n=l, 2,3, etc.) represented the increasing order of PPH severity. In the adjusted results, compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD) as the reference group, in the adjusted result for nulliparous, there was a decreased PPH risk in CS with indications (OR: 2.32; CI: 2.04–2.62), which was lower than that of CS without indications (OR: 2.50; CI: 2.01–2.96). The highest PPH risk in all subgroups (i.e. nulliparous and multiparous groups) was observed in the RC (OR: 3.61; CI: 3.16–4.17), which was nearly twice higher than that of the VBAC (OR: 1.82; CI: 1.33–2.52). CAVB (OR: 1.03; CI: 0.65–1.62) showed no significant difference with the reference group. Thus, we deemed that CS should be avoided in nulliparous pregnancies unless indicated, to prevent or reduce the rates for the use of RC or VBAC which are high risks of severe PPH to the parturient women.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 625
页数:7
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Say L(2014)Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis Lancet Glob Health 2 323-333
[2]  
Chou D(2017)An analysis of variations of indications and maternal-fetal prognosis for caesarean section in a tertiary hospital of Beijing Medicine 96 5509-486
[3]  
Gemmill A(2013)Maternal and infant outcome after caesarean section without recorded medical indication: findings from a Swedish case-control study BJOG 120 479-1272
[4]  
Liu Y(2008)Prevalence and risk factors of severe obstetric haemorrhage BJOG 115 1265-670
[5]  
Wang X(2016)Obstetrical disease spectrum in China: an epidemiological study of 111, 767 cases in 2011 WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. BJOG 123 667-1146
[6]  
Zou L(2015)Cesarean delivery on maternal request in China: what are the risks and benefits Chin Med J (Engl) 128 1137-817
[7]  
Karlström A(2015)Measuring the quality of inpatient obstetrical care Am J Obstet Gynecol 212 811-213
[8]  
Lindgren H(2007)Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery Obstet Gynecol Surv 62 207-8
[9]  
Hildingsson I(2001)Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section N Engl J Med 345 3-695
[10]  
Al-Zirqi I(1996)ACOG urges a cautious approach to vaginal birth after cesarean delivery N Engl J Med 335 689-460