Breast cancer in young women

被引:0
作者
Courtney A Gabriel
Susan M Domchek
机构
[1] University of Pennsylvania,Abramson Cancer Center
[2] University of Pennsylvania,Abramson Cancer Center
来源
Breast Cancer Research | / 12卷
关键词
Breast Cancer; Tamoxifen; Zoledronic Acid; Breast Cancer Survivor; TP53 Mutation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although uncommon, breast cancer in young women is worthy of special attention due to the unique and complex issues that are raised. This article reviews specific challenges associated with the care of younger breast cancer patients, which include fertility preservation, management of inherited breast cancer syndromes, maintenance of bone health, secondary prevention, and attention to psychosocial issues.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 885 条
[1]  
Anders CK(2009)Breast cancer before age 40 years Semin Oncol 36 237-249
[2]  
Johnson R(2003)Breast cancers among very young premenopausal women (United States) Cancer Causes Control 14 151-160
[3]  
Litton J(1996)The National Cancer Data Base report on breast carcinoma characteristics and outcome in relation to age Cancer 78 1838-1843
[4]  
Phillips M(2008)Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression J Clin Oncol 26 3324-3330
[5]  
Bleyer A(1994)Relationship of patient age to pathologic features of the tumor and prognosis for patients with stage I or II breast cancer J Clin Oncol 12 888-894
[6]  
Althuis MD(2002)Very young women (< 35 years) with operable breast cancer: features of disease at presentation Ann Oncol 13 273-279
[7]  
Brogan DD(2006)Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study JAMA 295 2492-2502
[8]  
Coates RJ(2004)The diagnosis of breast cancer in women younger than 40 Breast 13 297-306
[9]  
Daling JR(1999)Clinical value of mammography for symptomatic women 35 years of age and younger Am J Obstet Gynecol 180 1484-1490
[10]  
Gammon MD(2002)Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations Radiology 225 165-175