The adverbial theory of numbers: some clarifications

被引：0
作者：
Joongol Kim
机构：
[1] Sungkyunkwan University,Department of Philosophy
来源：
Synthese | 2020年 / 197卷
关键词：
The Caesar problem; Adverbial entities; Many-sorted logic; Explicit definition; Implicit definition; Contextual definition;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
In a forthcoming paper in this journal, entitled “Bad company objection to Joongol Kim’s adverbial theory of numbers”, Namjoong Kim presents an ingenious Russell-style paradox based on an analogue of Kim’s definition of the number 1, and argues that Kim’s theory needs to provide a criterion of demarcation between acceptable and unacceptable definitions of adverbial entities. This paper addresses this ‘bad company’ objection and some other related issues concerning Kim’s adverbial theory by clarifying the purposes and uses of the formal framework (ALA) of the theory.
引用
收藏
页码：3981 / 4000
页数：19
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Johnston M(1987)Is there a problem about persistence? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 61 107-135
[2]  
Kim J(2011)Frege’s context principle: An interpretation Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 193-213
[3]  
Kim J(2011)A strengthening of the Caesar problem Erkenntnis 75 123-36
[4]  
Kim J(2013)What are numbers? Synthese 190 1099-112
[5]  
Kim J(2014)Euclid strikes back at Frege Philosophial Quarterly 64 20-38
[6]  
Kim J(2014)The sortal resemblance problem Canadian Journal of Philosophy 44 407-424
[7]  
Kim J(2015)A logical foundation of arithmetic Studia Logica 103 113-44
[8]  
Kim J(2016)What are quantities? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 792-807
[9]  
Sellars W(1975)The adverbial theory of the objects of sensation Metaphilosophy 6 144-160
[10]  
Turner J(2010)Ontological pluralism Journal of Philosophy 107 5-34
1