Methods of training using pelvic trainers

被引:16
作者
Katz R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Urology, Hadassah Medical Centre, Ein Kerem, Jerusalem 91120
关键词
Radical Prostatectomy; Laparoscopic Skill; Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy; Virtual Reality Simulator; Laparoscopic Suture;
D O I
10.1007/s11934-006-0067-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
During the past decade, the clinical applications of laparoscopic surgery in urology have been growing steadily. The laparoscopic version of various procedures, such as nephrectomy, is becoming the standard of care. This has led to an increased need for laparoscopic training in urology and focused the attention on the various modalities for laparoscopic skill acquisition. The common training modalities for laparoscopy are box trainers, animal and cadaveric laparoscopy, and virtual reality simulators. Each modality carries its own benefits to the practicing surgeon. The box trainers are the first practiced and are basic training simulators. They were first designed to help with training in basic laparoscopic skills and to assist surgeons in getting acquainted with instruments. However, these simple boxes are being upgraded constantly by tissue- and organ-specific models, allowing the surgeon to train in a convenient and cost-effective environment. This article describes the ways to work with box trainers, from basic skills to advanced laparoscopic tasks, and discusses the contribution of these trainers to real surgery as well as their role in defining criterion levels of surgical performance. Copyright © 2006 by Current Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:100 / 106
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Clayman R.V., Kavoussi L.R., Soper N.J., Et al., Laparoscopic nephrectomy: Initial case report, J Urol, 146, pp. 278-282, (1991)
[2]  
Kaouk J.H., Gill I.S., Laparoscopic reconstructive urology, J Urol, 170, pp. 1070-1078, (2003)
[3]  
Rsssweiler J., Seeman O., Hatzinger M., Et al., Technical evolution of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after 450 cases, J Endourol, 17, pp. 143-154, (2003)
[4]  
Hoznek A., Salomon L., Olsson L.E., Et al., Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Creteil experience, Eur Urol, 40, pp. 38-45, (2001)
[5]  
Guillonneau B., Vallancien G., Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Montsouris experience, J Urol, 163, pp. 418-422, (2000)
[6]  
Lotan Y., Gettman M.T., Roehrborn C.G., Et al., Laparoscopic nephrectomy is cost effective compared to open nephrectomy in a large county hospital, JSLS, 7, pp. 111-115, (2003)
[7]  
Shalhav A.L., Dabagia M.A., Wagner T.T., Et al., Training post graduate urologists in laparoscopic surgery: The current challenge, J Urol, 167, pp. 2135-2137, (2002)
[8]  
Tevaearai H.T., Mueller X.M., Von Segesser L.K., 3D vision improves performance in a pelvic trainer, Endoscopy, 32, pp. 464-468, (2000)
[9]  
Frede T., Stock C., Renner C., Et al., Geometry of laparoscopic suturing and knotting techniques, J Endourol, 13, pp. 191-198, (1999)
[10]  
Blacker A.I., How to build your own laparoscopic trainer, J Endourol, 19, pp. 748-752, (2005)