Mine the process: investigating the cyclical nature of upper primary school students’ self-regulated learning

被引:0
作者
Sofie Heirweg
Mona De Smul
Emmelien Merchie
Geert Devos
Hilde Van Keer
机构
[1] Ghent University,Department of Educational Studies
来源
Instructional Science | 2020年 / 48卷
关键词
Self-regulated learning; Primary education; Process mining; SRL processes; Achievement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The present study investigates primary school students’ self-regulated learning (SRL) process by exploring the sequence in which SRL activities are conducted during learning. The aims of this study are twofold: investigating the presence of the theoretically hypothesized cyclical nature in students’ SRL process, as well as potential differences herein for high, average, and low achievers. Think-aloud data of 104 upper primary school students were analysed by means of process mining analysis. The results indicate that students commonly adopt a cyclical approach to learning by implementing preparatory, performance, and appraisal activities during learning. However, the results indicate clear differences in the quality of students’ SRL process. High achievers, compared to low and average achievers, show a more strategic and adaptive approach to learning during all phases of their learning process. They more strategically and effectively orient on and plan assignments, combine different cognitive strategies, and adopt self-evaluation to regulate their learning process.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 369
页数:32
相关论文
共 131 条
[1]  
Azevedo R(2007)Understanding the complex nature of self-regulatory processes in learning with computer-based learning environments: An introduction Metacognition and Learning 2 57-65
[2]  
Bannert M(2014)Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students’ self-regulated learning Metacognition and Learning 9 161-185
[3]  
Reimann P(1999)Self-regulated learning: Where we are today International Journal of Educational Research 1 445-457
[4]  
Sonnenberg C(1997)Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students Learning and Instruction 7 161-186
[5]  
Boekaerts M(2005)Self regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention Applied Psychology 54 199-231
[6]  
Boekaerts M(1997)Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide The Journal of the Learning Sciences 6 271-315
[7]  
Boekaerts M(2009)Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: Variations across grade level and math context Journal of School Psychology 47 291-314
[8]  
Corno L(2016)A comparison of high and low achieving students on self-regulated learning variables Learning and Individual Differences 20 391-409
[9]  
Chi MTH(2008)Focusing the conceptual lens on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning Educational Psychology Review 46 6-25
[10]  
Cleary TJ(2011)Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model Educational Psychologist 2 219-244