Hybrid alliances and radical innovation: the performance implications of integrating exploration and exploitation

被引:0
作者
Massimo G. Colombo
Liliana Doganova
Evila Piva
Diego D’Adda
Philippe Mustar
机构
[1] Politecnico di Milano,Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering
[2] CSI - Centre de sociologie de l’innovation,MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University
[3] CNRS UMR 7185,Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell’Informazione
[4] Università Politecnica delle Marche,MINES ParisTech, PSL Research University
[5] POLLEN - Pôle Entrepreneuriat,undefined
来源
The Journal of Technology Transfer | 2015年 / 40卷
关键词
Alliances; Exploration; Radical innovation; Academic spin-offs; Ambidexterity; L26; O31; O32;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this paper we examine the innovation performance of hybrid alliances, that is, alliances that combine exploration and exploitation activities. While previous research has emphasized the tensions engendered by the combination of exploration and exploitation, we claim that the integration of these two types of activities can generate synergies as well. We argue that, in the case of alliances involving academic spin-offs (ASOs), these synergies may outweigh the tensions under specific conditions, and thus improve alliance innovation performance. Specifically, we hypothesize that the relative performance of exploitation activities is greater in hybrid alliances when the alliance has radical innovation outcomes. Conversely, the relative performance of exploration activities is greater in hybrid alliances when the alliance has incremental innovation outcomes. These hypotheses are tested using fine-grained data on a sample of 149 alliances involving European ASOs.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 722
页数:26
相关论文
共 158 条
  • [1] Andriopoulos C(2009)Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation Organization Science 20 696-717
  • [2] Lewis MW(2000)Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology Strategic Management Journal 21 267-294
  • [3] Baum JAC(2002)Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries Administrative Science Quarterly 47 676-706
  • [4] Calabrese T(1996)Coordination, organizational boundaries and fads in business practices Industrial and Corporate Change 5 89-112
  • [5] Silverman BS(1955)The informant in quantitative research The American Journal of Sociology 60 339-342
  • [6] Benner MJ(2004)Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries Organization Science 15 555-568
  • [7] Tushman M(2006)Uncertainty, opportunism, and governance: The effects of volatility and ambiguity on formal and relational contracting Academy of Management Journal 49 1058-1077
  • [8] Camerer C(2005)The impact of M&A on the R&D process: An empirical analysis of the role of technological- and market-relatedness Research Policy 34 195-220
  • [9] Knez M(2000)The incumbent’s Curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation Journal of Marketing 64 1-17
  • [10] Campbell DT(2010)The contribution of university research to the growth of academic start-ups: An empirical analysis Journal of Technology Transfer 35 113-140