Phrasal Proper Names in German and Norwegian

被引:0
作者
Marit Julien
Dorian Roehrs
机构
[1] Lund University,
[2] University of North Texas,undefined
来源
The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics | 2023年 / 26卷
关键词
Morpho-syntax; DP; Proper names; German; Norwegian;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper discusses the morpho-syntax of phrasal proper names like Deutsche Bahn ‘German Railway’ and Norske Skog ‘Norwegian Forest’ in German and Norwegian. As regards determiner elements, there are three types of phrasal proper names in German: some proper names do not have a definite article, some do, and yet others exhibit a possessive. Depending on the syntactic context, the first two types pattern the same as regards the presence or absence of the article but contrast with the third, where the possessive is always present. It is proposed that proper names in German vary in their structure as regards the presence of the DP-level: unlike articles, possessives have a referential marker, and a DP is obligatorily projected with the latter element. Norwegian is different. While proper names in Norwegian also vary in the presence or absence of determiners, there is no flexibility—determiners are always present or always absent, independent of the syntactic context. It is proposed that unlike in German, the DP-level in Norwegian is always present. As argued by Roehrs (Glossa J Gen Linguist, 5(1):1–38, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.1267), phrasal proper names involve a regular syntactic derivation. Given that elements of regular DPs are sensitive to definiteness in Norwegian, it is proposed that Norwegian proper names involve an obligatory definiteness feature. As this feature surfaces in the DP-level, the latter must be present in that language in all instances. Besides this cross-linguistic difference, we document that phrasal PN may show features of recursivity evidenced most clearly in Norwegian.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Alexiadou Artemis(2005)Possessors and (in)definiteness Lingua 115 787-819
[2]  
Alexiadou Artemis(2019)Proper name compounds: a comparative perspective English Language and Linguistics 23 855-877
[3]  
Allerton DJ(1987)The linguistic and sociolinguistic status of proper names. What are they, and who do they belong to? Journal of Pragmatics 11 61-92
[4]  
Anderson John M(2003)On the structure of names Folia Linguistica 37 347-398
[5]  
Anderssen Merete(2012)A spanning approach to the acquisition of double definiteness in Norwegian Iberia: An International Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 4 1-34
[6]  
Bošković Željko(2005)On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP Studia Linguistica 59 1-45
[7]  
Bruening Benjamin(2010)Ditransitive asymmetries and a theory of idiom formation Linguistic Inquiry 41 519-562
[8]  
Cinque Guglielmo(2005)Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions Linguistic Inquiry 36 315-332
[9]  
Coppock Elizabeth(2015)Definiteness and determinacy Linguistics and Philosophy 38 377-435
[10]  
Beaver David(2001)Movement operations after syntax Linguistic Inquiry 32 555-595