Application of SWAT model and SWAT-CUP software in simulation and analysis of sediment uncertainty in arid and semi-arid watersheds (case study: the Zoshk-Abardeh watershed)

被引:49
作者
Hosseini, Seyed Hashem [1 ]
Khaleghi, Mohammad Reza [1 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Torbat E Jam Branch, Torbat E Jam, Iran
关键词
SWAT; SUFI-2; Calibration; Uncertainty analysis; Zoshk-Abardeh watershed; CLIMATE-CHANGE; MULTI-DAY; RIVER; QUALITY; CALIBRATION; HYDROGRAPH; BASIN; AVAILABILITY; REGRESSION; STREAMFLOW;
D O I
10.1007/s40808-020-00846-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This research aimed to appraise the performance of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model in sediment flow simulation and also to investigate the uncertainty of the model in the watershed areas of arid and semi-arid regions. In this survey, we used the Sequential Uncertainty Fitting ver.2 (SUFI-2) algorithm to assess the uncertainty and calibrate the model. Different factors of water resources are simulated, and we consider the crop yield and water quality at the Hydrological Response Units (HRU) level. Besides, to quantify the water resources, we implemented monthly time intervals. Also, we used monthly time intervals to quantify the water resources. The results showed that in a 3-year validation period (2007-2010), theP-factor and ther-factor were 0.28 and 0.38 respectively, while in the 7-year calibration period (2000-2006), these two factors were 0.29 and 0.39, respectively. The findings of this study proved that in the validation period, statistical indicators of model evaluation compriseR(2),bR(2), and the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) coefficients were 0.85, 0.23, and 0.47, respectively, while in the calibration period, these coefficients were 0.46, 0.14, and 0.37, respectively. The results of uncertainty and calibration analysis were acceptable, but in the validation phase, the model has been more applicable and useful. These results show the acceptable efficiency of the SWAT model in simulating the sediment load of the study area. To assess the sensitivities of 22 input parameters, we used SWAT Calibration Uncertainties Program (SWAT-CUP) and achieved three of the most sensitive parameters comprising CN2, SOL_BD, and USLE_P. In contrast, the parameters with the least sensitivity were SLSUBBSN, GW_DELAY, and ESCO. We can use the calibrated model as inputs for SWAT, to assess the impact of climate change on soil erosion.
引用
收藏
页码:2003 / 2013
页数:11
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] A continental-scale hydrology and water quality model for Europe: Calibration and uncertainty of a high-resolution large-scale SWAT model
    Abbaspour, K. C.
    Rouholahnejad, E.
    Vaghefi, S.
    Srinivasan, R.
    Yang, H.
    Klove, B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 524 : 733 - 752
  • [2] Abbaspour KC, 2005, MODSIM 2005: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION: ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND DECISION MAKING, P2449
  • [3] Abbaspour K.C., 2013, Swat-Cup 2012, SWAT Calibration Uncertainty ProgramA User Manual
  • [4] Modelling hydrology and water quality in the pre-alpine/alpine Thur watershed using SWAT
    Abbaspour, Karim C.
    Yang, Jing
    Maximov, Ivan
    Siber, Rosi
    Bogner, Konrad
    Mieleitner, Johanna
    Zobrist, Juerg
    Srinivasan, Raghavan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2007, 333 (2-4) : 413 - 430
  • [5] Hydrologic Calibration and Validation of SWAT in a Snow-Dominated Rocky Mountain Watershed, Montana, USA
    Ahl, Robert S.
    Woods, Scott W.
    Zuuring, Hans R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2008, 44 (06): : 1411 - 1430
  • [6] Effect of river flow on the quality of estuarine and coastal waters using machine learning models
    Alizadeh, Mohamad Javad
    Kavianpour, Mohamad Reza
    Danesh, Malihe
    Adolf, Jason
    Shamshirband, Shahabbodin
    Chau, Kwok-Wing
    [J]. ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2018, 12 (01) : 810 - 823
  • [7] Toward multi-day-ahead forecasting of suspended sediment concentration using ensemble models
    Alizadeh, Mohamad Javad
    Nodoushan, Ehsan Jafari
    Kalarestaghi, Naghi
    Chau, Kwok Wing
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2017, 24 (36) : 28017 - 28025
  • [8] Ang Raksmey, 2018, Water Science, V32, P89, DOI 10.1016/j.wsj.2017.12.002
  • [9] Arnold JG, 2012, T ASABE, V55, P1491
  • [10] Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment - Part 1: Model development
    Arnold, JG
    Srinivasan, R
    Muttiah, RS
    Williams, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1998, 34 (01): : 73 - 89