A Systematic Review of Strengths and Resilience Outcome Literature Relevant to Children and Adolescents

被引:53
作者
Brownlee K. [1 ]
Rawana J. [2 ]
Franks J. [3 ,4 ]
Harper J. [4 ,5 ]
Bajwa J. [4 ,5 ]
O'Brien E. [4 ,5 ]
Clarkson A. [6 ]
机构
[1] School of Social Work, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, P7B 5E1
[2] Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON
[3] ErinoakKids Centre for Treatment and Development, Mississauga, ON
[4] Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON
[5] Department of Psychology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON
[6] Carleton University, Ottawa, ON
关键词
Childhood development; Psychological strengths; Resiliency; Strength-based practice; Strengths intervention;
D O I
10.1007/s10560-013-0301-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The concepts of strengths and resilience are essential for understanding and promoting positive development in children and adolescents. These concepts have been studied in the research literature for many years and more recently have been applied to child and adolescent assessment and intervention research. However, strength and resilience based intervention programs have not been evaluated rigorously for their use of empirical methodology. In this article, we systematically identified and reviewed all of the outcome studies over the last decade for strength and resilience based intervention programs to assess the extent to which these studies utilized controlled empirical methodology. The results of the review yielded 11 outcome studies that examined strength and resilience based practices. Using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies developed by the Effective Public Health Practice Project, we found three studies to be high quality, exhibiting high levels of experimentally controlled research. The remaining 8 studies we considered to be moderate to weak quality research. We concluded that these 11 studies provide preliminary support for the efficacy of strength and resilience based interventions. Our systematic review also highlights areas where methodology in future studies can be strengthened to provide more conclusive evidence of these approaches. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 459
页数:24
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Armijo-Olivo S., Stiles C.R., Hagen N.A., Biondo P.D., Cummings G.G., Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: A comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: Methodological Research, Journal of Education in Clinical Practices, 18, pp. 12-18, (2010)
[2]  
Barrett P.M., Sonderegger R., Xenos S., Using FRIENDS to combat anxiety and adjustment problems among young migrants to Australia: A national trial, Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 8, pp. 241-260, (2003)
[3]  
Barton W.H., Mackin J.R., Fields J., Assessing youth strengths in residential juvenile correctional program, Residential Treatment of Children & Youth, 23, pp. 11-36, (2006)
[4]  
Barton W.H., Mackin J.R., Fields J., Assessing youth strengths in a residential juvenile correctional program, Residential Treatment for Child and Youth, 23, pp. 11-36, (2008)
[5]  
Belcher H.M.E., Lockhart P.J., Perkins-Parks S., McNally M., Using PANDA (preventing the abuse of tobacco, narcotics, drugs, and alcohol) in a Baltimore City head start setting: A preliminary study, Journal of Black Psychology, 26, pp. 437-449, (2000)
[6]  
Cox K.F., Investigating the impact of strength-based assessment on youth with emotional or behavioral disorders, Journal of Child and Family Studies, 15, pp. 287-301, (2006)
[7]  
Donnon T., Hammond W., Understanding the relationship between resiliency and bullying in adolescence: An assessment of youth resiliency from five urban junior high schools, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 16, pp. 449-471, (2007)
[8]  
Edwards O.W., Mumford V.E., Serra-Roldan R., A positive youth development model for students considered at-risk, School Psychology International, 28, pp. 29-45, (2007)
[9]  
Edwards O.W., Mumford V.E., Shillingford M.A., Serra-Roldan R., Developmental assets: A prevention framework for students considered at risk, Children & Schools, 29, pp. 145-153, (2007)
[10]  
Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies, (1998)