The perceptions of professional soccer players on the risk of injury from competition and training on natural grass and 3rd generation artificial turf

被引:31
作者
Poulos C.C.N. [1 ]
Gallucci J. [2 ,3 ]
Gage W.H. [1 ]
Baker J. [1 ]
Buitrago S. [1 ]
Macpherson A.K. [1 ]
机构
[1] School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, 4700 Keele St, Toronto
[2] JAG Physical Therapy, NJ
[3] Major League Soccer, New York Cit
关键词
Artificial turf; Grass; Injury; Perceptions; Soccer;
D O I
10.1186/2052-1847-6-11
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to describe professional soccer players' perceptions towards injuries, physical recovery and the effect of surface related factors on injury resulting from soccer participation on 3rd generation artificial turf (FT) compared to natural grass (NG). Methods: Information was collected through a questionnaire that was completed by 99 professional soccer players from 6 teams competing in Major League Soccer (MLS) during the 2011 season. Results: The majority (93% and 95%) of the players reported that playing surface type and quality influenced the risk of sustaining an injury. Players believed that playing and training on FT increased the risk of sustaining a non-contact injury as opposed to a contact injury. The players identified three surface related risk factors on FT, which they related to injuries and greater recovery times: 1) Greater surface stiffness 2) Greater surface friction 3) Larger metabolic cost to playing on artificial grounds. Overall, 94% of the players chose FT as the surface most likely to increase the risk of sustaining an injury. Conclusions: Players believe that the risk of injury differs according to surface type, and that FT is associated with an increased risk of non-contact injury. Future studies should be designed prospectively to systematically track the perceptions of groups of professional players training and competing on FT and NG. © 2014 Poulos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Junge A., Dvorak J., Soccer injuries: a review on incidence and prevention, Sports Med, 34, pp. 929-938, (2004)
[2]  
(2012)
[3]  
Stiles V.H., James I.T., Dixon S.J., Guisasola I.N., Natural turf surfaces: the case for continued research, Sports Med, 39, pp. 65-84, (2009)
[4]  
(2006)
[5]  
Ekstrand J., Nigg B.M., Surface-related injuries in soccer, Sports Med, 8, pp. 56-62, (1989)
[6]  
Ekstrand J., Timpka T., Hagglund M., Risk of injury in elite football played on artificial turf versus natural grass: a prospective two-cohort study, Br J Sports Med, 40, pp. 975-980, (2006)
[7]  
Ekstrand J., Hagglund M., Fuller C.W., Comparison of injuries sustained on artificial turf and grass by male and female football players, Scand J Med Sci Sports, 21, pp. 824-832, (2011)
[8]  
Fuller C.W., Dick R.W., Corlette J., Schmalz R., Comparison of the incidence, nature and cause of injuries sustained on grass and new generation artificial turf by male and female football players Part 2 training injuries, Br J Sports Med, 41, pp. i27-i32, (2007)
[9]  
Fuller C.W., Dick R.W., Corlette J., Schmalz R., Comparison of the incidence, nature and cause of injuries sustained on grass and new generation artificial turf by male and female football players Part 1 match injuries, Br J Sports Med, 41, pp. i20-i26, (2007)
[10]  
Williams S., Hume P.A., Kara S., A review of football injuries on third and fourth generation artificial turfs compared with natural turf, Sports Med, 41, pp. 903-923, (2011)