Lateral subvastus approach with tibial tubercle osteotomy for primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical outcome and complications compared to medial parapatellar approach

被引：10

作者：

Langen S. ^{[1
]}

Gaber S. ^{[1
]}

Zdravkovic V. ^{[1
]}

Giesinger K. ^{[1
]}

Jost B. ^{[1
]}

Behrend H. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gall

来源：

European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology | 2016年 / 26卷 / 2期

关键词：

Lateral approach; Tibial tubercle osteotomy; Total knee arthroplasty;

D O I：

10.1007/s00590-015-1718-y

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Purpose: The lateral subvastus approach (LSVA) with tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO) is an alternative approach for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in selected patients. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between LSV and medial parapatellar approaches for primary TKA and to investigate incidence of complications related to TTO. Methods: A total of 580 patients with primary TKA, meeting the inclusion criteria, were treated at our hospital from February 2006 until February 2013. All patients’ data were included in the local arthroplasty register and were followed up 12 months postoperatively. The data set contains: demographic data, the WOMAC score, the KSS as well as knee flexion and complications related to tibial tubercle osteotomy. Results: The clinical outcome after TKA using the LSVA combined with TTO was comparable with those using the medial standard approach 1 year postoperatively. Four patients (3.8 %) needed a revision due to complications related to tubercle osteotomy. Conclusions: The LSVA is thus a viable alternative in cases of primary TKA if technical difficulties with the medial approach are anticipated. Applying precise surgical technique, the LSVA seems to be a safe and reproducible procedure. © 2015, Springer-Verlag France.

引用

页码：215 / 222

页数：7

共 29 条

[1]

Baumann C., Rat A., Osnowycz G., Mainard D., Delagoutte J., Cuny C., Guillemin F., Do clinical presentation and pre-operative quality of life predict satisfaction with care after total hip or knee replacement?, J Bone Joint Surg, 88, 3, pp. 366-373, (2006)

[2]

Lingard E., Katz J., Wright E., Sledge C., Kinemax Outcomes G., Predicting the outcome of total knee arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg, 86-A, 10, pp. 2179-2186, (2004)

[3]

Gonzalez M., Mekhail A., The failed total knee arthroplasty: evaluation and etiology, J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 12, 6, pp. 436-446, (2004)

[4]

Sr P., Pinaroli A., Servien E., Neyret P., Tibial tubercle osteotomy in primary total knee arthroplasty: a safe procedure or not?, Knee, 15, 6, pp. 439-446, (2008)

[5]

Christian Z., Lukas L., van den Michel B., Peter N., Tuberositas osteotomy for total knee arthroplasty: a review of the literature, J Knee Surg, (2010)

[6]

Hirschmann M., Hoffmann M., Krause R., Jenabzadeh R.-A., Arnold M., Friederich N., Anterolateral approach with tibial tubercle osteotomy versus standard medial approach for primary total knee arthroplasty: does it matter?, BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 11, (2010)

[7]

Whiteside L., Ohl M., Tibial tubercle osteotomy for exposure of the difficult total knee arthroplasty, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 260, pp. 6-9, (1990)

[8]

Dolin M., Osteotomy of the tibial tubercle in total knee replacement. A technical note, J Bone Joint Surg, 65, 5, pp. 704-706, (1983)

[9]

Whiteside L., Exposure in difficult total knee arthroplasty using tibial tubercle osteotomy, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 321, pp. 32-35, (1995)

[10]

Hay G., Kampshoff J., Kuster M., Lateral subvastus approach with osteotomy of the tibial tubercle for total knee replacement: a two-year prospective, randomised, blinded controlled trial, J Bone Joint Surg, 92, 6, pp. 862-866, (2010)

← 1 2 3 →