Conversion during thoracoscopic lobectomy: related factors and learning curve impact

被引:10
作者
Smith D.E. [1 ]
Dietrich A. [1 ]
Nicolas M. [1 ]
Da Lozzo A. [1 ]
Beveraggi E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Thoracic Surgery and Lung Transplant, Perón 4190, Buenos Aires
关键词
Conversion; Learning curve; Related factors; Thoracotomy; Vats lobectomy;
D O I
10.1007/s13304-015-0334-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy has become a standard procedure for lung cancer treatment. Conversion-related factors and learning curve impacts, were poorly described. The aim of this study was to review the reasons and related factor for conversion in VATS lobectomy and the impact on this of the surgeon’s learning curve. From June 2009 to May 2014, 154 patients who underwent a VATS lobectomy were included in our study. Patients’ characteristics, pathology background, operative times, overall length of stay, overall morbidity and type of major complications were recorded for all patients and compared between non converted (n = 133) and converted (n = 21) patients. To evaluate surgeon’s learning curve, we analyzed rates and causes of conversion in the first period (first 77 patients) and in the last period (78–154 patients). Patients characteristics were similar between converted and non-converted groups. Patients who were converted to open thoracotomy presented more frecuently tumors >3 cms (P = 0.02). The average of operative times and the length of stay were not significantly different between groups. Overall morbidity and major complications were also similar in both groups. There were no impact of surgeon’s learning curve in overall rate conversion in both groups. Emergency conversion was always secondary to vascular accidents, all in the first group (p = 0.059). Surgeons should be expecting to perform a conversion to a thoracotomy in patients who present in preoperative studies, tumors greater than 3 cms. Learning curve only affected the emergency conversion, occurred all in the first half of our series. © 2015, Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).
引用
收藏
页码:427 / 432
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]  
Hoksch B., Ablassmaier B., Walter M., Muller J.M., Complication rate after thoracoscopic and conventional lobectomy, Zentralbl Chir, 128, pp. 106-110, (2003)
[12]  
Sugiura H., Morikawa T., Kaji M., Sasamura Y., Kondo S., Katoh H., Long-term benefits for the quality of life after videoassisted thoracoscopic lobectomy in patients with lung cancer, Surg Laparosc Endosc, 9, pp. 403-410, (1999)
[13]  
Hanna J.M., Berry M.F., D'Amico T.A., Contraindications of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical lobectomy and determinants of conversion to open, J Thorac Dis, 5, pp. 182-189, (2013)
[14]  
Hennon M., Sahai R.K., Yendamuri S., Et al., Safety of thoracoscopic lobectomy in locally advanced lung cancer, Ann Surg Oncol, 18, pp. 3732-3736, (2011)
[15]  
Roviaro G., Varoli F., Vergani C., Et al., Video-assisted thoracoscopic major pulmonary resections: technical aspects, personal series of 259 patients, and review of the literature, Surg Endosc, 18, pp. 1551-1558, (2004)
[16]  
Gazala S., Hunt I., Valji A., Stewart K., Bedard E.R., A method of assessing reasons for conversion during video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy, Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, 12, 6, pp. 962-964, (2011)
[17]  
Krasna M.J., Deshmukh S., McLaughlin J.S., Complications of thoracoscopy, Ann Thorac Surg, 61, pp. 1066-1069, (1996)
[18]  
McKenna R.J., Houck W., Fuller C.B., Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases, Ann Thorac Surg, 81, 2, pp. 421-425, (2006)
[19]  
Jensen K., Ringsted C., Hansen H.J., Petersen R.H., Konge L., Simulation-based training for thoracoscopic lobectomy: a randomized controlled trial: virtual-reality versus black-box simulation, Surg Endosc, 28, 6, pp. 1821-1829, (2014)
[20]  
Li X., Wang J., Ferguson M.K., Competence versus mastery: the time course for developing proficiency in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy, J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 147, 4, pp. 1150-1154, (2014)