Attending to items in working memory: evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related

被引:0
作者
Evie Vergauwe
Nelson Cowan
机构
[1] University of Missouri,Department of Psychological Sciences
来源
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review | 2015年 / 22卷
关键词
Working memory; Attention and memory; Short-term memory; Refreshing; Memory search;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Refreshing refers to the use of attention to reactivate items in working memory (WM). In the present study, we aimed to test the hypothesis that refreshing is closely related to memory search. The assumption is that refreshing and memory search both rely on a basic covert memory process that quickly retrieves the memory items into the focus of attention, thereby reactivating the information (Cowan, 1992; Vergauwe & Cowan, 2014). Consistent with the idea that people use their attention to prevent loss from WM, previous research has shown that increasing the proportion of time during which attention is occupied by concurrent processing, thereby preventing refreshing, results in poorer recall performance in complex span tasks (Barrouillet, Portrat, & Camos, Psychological Review, 118, 175–192, 2011). Here, we tested whether recall performance is differentially affected by prolonged attentional capture caused by memory search. If memory search and refreshing both rely on retrieval from WM, then prolonged attentional capture caused by memory search should not lead to forgetting, because memory items are assumed to be reactivated during memory search, in the same way that they would be if that period of time were used for refreshing. Consistent with this idea, prolonged attentional capture had a disruptive effect when it was caused by the need to retrieve knowledge from long-term memory, but not when it was caused by the need to search through the content of WM. The present results support the idea that refreshing operates through a process of retrieval of information into the focus of attention.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1006
页数:5
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Barrouillet P(2007)Time and cognitive load in working memory Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 33 570-585
[2]  
Bernardin S(2011)On the law relating processing to storage in working memory Psychological Review 118 175-192
[3]  
Portrat S(1975)Memory retrieval from long and short lists Science 188 1031-1033
[4]  
Vergauwe E(2009)Two maintenance mechanisms of verbal information in working memory Journal of Memory and Language 61 457-469
[5]  
Camos V(2005)Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12 769-786
[6]  
Barrouillet P(1992)Verbal memory span and the timing of spoken recall Journal of Memory and Language 31 668-684
[7]  
Portrat S(1998)Two separate verbal processing rates contributing to short-term memory span Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 127 141-160
[8]  
Camos V(2007)The effects of processing time and processing rate on forgetting in working memory: Testing four models of the complex span paradigm Memory & Cognition 35 1675-1684
[9]  
Burrows D(2011)How does processing affect storage in working memory tasks? Evidence for both domain-general and domain-specific effects Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37 688-705
[10]  
Okada R(1962)Rate of implicit speech Perceptual and Motor Skills 15 646-203