The prognostic impact of age in patients with triple-negative breast cancer

被引:0
作者
Cornelia Liedtke
K. R. Hess
T. Karn
A. Rody
L. Kiesel
G. N. Hortobagyi
L. Pusztai
A. M. Gonzalez-Angulo
机构
[1] University of Schleswig–Holstein,Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics
[2] Campus Luebeck,Department of Biostatistics
[3] The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[4] J. W. Goethe-University,Department of Gynecology and Obstetric
[5] University of Muenster,Department of Breast Medical Oncology
[6] The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,undefined
[7] Breast Medical Oncology,undefined
[8] Yale School of Medicine,undefined
来源
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2013年 / 138卷
关键词
Triple-negative breast cancer; Age at diagnosis; Prognosis; Chemotherapy; Survival;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to assess the prognostic impact of age in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). 1,732 patients with primary TNBC were analyzed. Five age cohorts (≤30, 31–40, 41–50, 51–60, and >60 years) at diagnosis were correlated with clinical/pathological parameters. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to examine the effect of age on disease-free (DFS), distant disease-free (DDFS), and overall survival (OS). In patients with TNBC, increasing age at diagnosis was inversely correlated with tumor grade (P < 0.0001); likelihood of being non-Caucasian (P = 0.0001); likelihood of getting chemotherapy (P < 0.0001); and positively correlated with DFS (P = 0.0003); DDFS (P < 0.0001); and OS (P < 0.0001). The median DFS for patients 31–40 and older than 60 years was 4 years [95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) 2–5] and 8 years (95 % CI 5–14, respectively, P = 0.0003). The DDFS and OS were also statistically significantly shorter for younger patients. In multivariate analysis, tumor size, nodal stage, tumor grade, and age remained significant independent prognostic variables. Clinical characteristics of TNBC differ by age group, patients ≤40 years have poorer survival despite more aggressive systemic therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 599
页数:8
相关论文
共 159 条
[1]  
Perou CM(2000)Molecular portraits of human breast tumours Nature 406 747-752
[2]  
Sorlie T(2009)Triple-negative breast cancer—current status and future directions Ann Oncol 20 1913-1927
[3]  
Eisen MB(2008)Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer J Clin Oncol 26 1275-1281
[4]  
van de Rijn M(2012)Prognostic value of proliferation assay in the luminal, HER2-positive, and triple-negative biologic classes of breast cancer Breast Cancer Res 14 R3-1351
[5]  
Jeffrey SS(2009)Breast cancer in young women: poor survival despite intensive treatment PLoS ONE 4 e7695-1253
[6]  
Rees CA(2012)Elucidating prognosis and biology of breast cancer arising in young women using gene expression profiling Clin Cancer Res 18 1341-3636
[7]  
Pollack JR(2011)Prognostic significance of young age (<35 years) by subtype based on ER, PR, and HER2 status in breast cancer: a nationwide registry-based study World J Surg 35 1244-1087
[8]  
Ross DT(2002)Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer J Clin Oncol 20 3628-2655
[9]  
Johnsen H(1988)Relative worth of estrogen or progesterone receptor and pathologic characteristics of differentiation as indicators of prognosis in node negative breast cancer patients: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-06 J Clin Oncol 6 1076-1211
[10]  
Akslen LA(2007)Residual ductal carcinoma in situ in patients with complete eradication of invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not adversely affect patient outcome J Clin Oncol 25 2650-10874