A multidimensional approach to academic productivity

被引:0
作者
Benedetto Torrisi
机构
[1] Catania University,
来源
Scientometrics | 2014年 / 99卷
关键词
Academic productivity complex; Scientific productivity; Assignments and awards; Patents and service productivity; Didactics productivity; I23; J24; O15;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study represents one of the first attempts to use empirical analysis to estimate academic productivity complex and proves the thesis that academic productivity is a function of multidimensional combination of the work of academic researchers: the scientific work, education, and external relationships. Given the complexity of academic productivity, it is necessary to clarify that it is divided into scientific productivity of the first type (scientific publications); scientific productivity of the second type (awards and academic positions); productivity in terms of external relationships (or external advice); and educational productivity. This objective of this paper is achieved through a sample survey (2,738 academics responded) conducted by Italian researchers from the PIR research project. The results obtained, however (as a case of estimates obtained using the results of a sample survey), are the result of a working reality that Italian academics are flooded by a myriad of activities that are not always consistent with the primary aims of the work of a researcher with an organisational and environmental well-being at the limit of iper productivity (or hyper productivity). The overall productivity (academic productivity) is significantly correlated with the four dimensions: average annual scientific productivity of the first type, average annual scientific productivity of the second type, the productivity external advice and, lastly, teaching productivity. The estimate of the sizes for the four indicators of productivity are the result of a literature search of the primary techniques used to assess productivity in academia. By comparing the most significant indicators, we managed to select all of the technical aspects missing in the Italian system of evaluation. This process allowed for us to add additional variables characterising the various aspects of productivity and prove the validity of our theory about the multidimensionality of academic productivity.
引用
收藏
页码:755 / 783
页数:28
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Abramo G(2008)Allocative efficiency in public research funding: Can bibliometrics help? Research Policy 38 206-215
  • [2] D’angelo CA(1998)Research productivity in a system of universities Annalse d’Economie et de Statistique 49/50 127-162
  • [3] Caprasecca A(2006)Advanced indicators of productivity of universities. An application of robust nonparametric method to Italian data Scientometrics 66 389-410
  • [4] Adams J. D.(2004)Scientists’ collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital Research Policy 33 599-616
  • [5] Griliches Z.(2008)University patenting and scientific productivity. A quantitative study of Italian academic inventors European Management Review 5 91-109
  • [6] Bonaccorsi A(1998)The anatomy of a large—scale hypertextual web search engine Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30 107-117
  • [7] Darario C(2005)How do career strategies, gender, and work environment affect faculty productivity levels in university-based science centers? Review of Policy Research 22 637-655
  • [8] Simar L(2007)Foreign-born academic and engineers: Producing more and getting less than their U.S. born peers? Research in Higher Education 48 909-940
  • [9] Bozeman B(2007)Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication pro- ductivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments The Journal of Higher Education 78 542-571
  • [10] Corley E(1982)Economics departments rankings: Research incentives, constraints and efficiency American Economic Review 72 1131-1141