Endovenous Laser Ablation of the Small Saphenous Vein Sparing the Saphenopopliteal Junction

被引:0
|
作者
Bertrand Janne d’Othée
T. Gregory Walker
Sanjeeva P. Kalva
Suvranu Ganguli
Brian Davison
机构
[1] Massachusetts General Hospital–Harvard Medical School,Department of Imaging, Division of Vascular Imaging and Intervention
[2] Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center–Harvard Medical School,Department of Radiology
[3] TVV,Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
[4] Lincoln Medical Center,undefined
[5] University of Maryland School of Medicine,undefined
来源
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | 2010年 / 33卷
关键词
Varicose vein; Endovenous ablation; Saphenous veins; Laser; Endovenous thermal ablation; Small saphenous vein;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To assess outcomes after endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the small saphenous vein (SSV). Retrospective review was performed of all consecutive EVLA procedures performed over a 39-month period at three neighboring vein practices for symptomatic, duplex ultrasound-proven incompetence of the SSV. EVLA was performed under ultrasound guidance with an 810- or 980-nm diode laser in continuous mode using the pullback method while sparing the deep, most cephalad segment of the SSV near the saphenopopliteal junction. Follow-up after EVLA included patient symptoms, physical examination, and duplex ultrasound. Pretreatment variables were similar across all three practices. EVLA was performed to treat 67 incompetent SSVs in 63 patients (86% women; mean age and 95% confidence interval, 50 ± 3 years; range, 20–82 years). Average energy delivered was 92 J/cm. Immediate technical success and occlusion of the treated vein at 1–2 weeks was 100%. Imaging follow-up length was 243 ± 65 days (range, 3–893 days). Clinical follow-up (243 ± 66 days) showed symptomatic improvement in 66 (99%) of 67 patients; one patient had recanalization with recurrent reflux by ultrasound (2%). Complications included one case of paresthesias lasting beyond 1 month of follow-up (2%) and three cases of superficial phlebitis (4%), but no deep vein thrombosis, skin burns, or other complications. Although ablation involved only the superficial portion of the SSV and spared its deep segment in the popliteal fossa, SSV occlusion typically extended up to the saphenopopliteal junction or to a gastrocnemial collateral, without popliteal vein involvement. EVLA of the SSV is safe and effective when the saphenopopliteal junction and popliteal fossa are avoided. This approach may help reduce the risk of paresthesias or other complications while maintaining low recanalization rates.
引用
收藏
页码:766 / 771
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Recurrence patterns after endovenous laser treatment of saphenous vein reflux
    Winokur, Ronald S.
    Khilnani, Neil M.
    Min, Robert J.
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2016, 31 (07) : 496 - 500
  • [32] Retrograde endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein using the superficial inferior epigastric vein as access vessel illustrated by a case report
    Whiteley, Mark S.
    Davies, Charlotte E.
    SAGE OPEN MEDICAL CASE REPORTS, 2021, 9
  • [33] Does Puncture Site Affect the Rate of Nerve Injuries Following Endovenous Laser Ablation of the Small Saphenous Veins?
    Doganci, S.
    Yildirim, V.
    Demirkilic, U.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 41 (03) : 400 - 405
  • [34] A retrospective study comparing endovenous laser ablation and microwave ablation for great saphenous varicose veins
    Mao, Jieqi
    Zhang, Ci
    Wang, Zhanshan
    Gan, Shujie
    Li, Ke
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (07) : 873 - 877
  • [35] Combined endovenous laser treatment and ambulatory phlebectomy for the treatment of saphenous vein incompetence
    Jung, I. M.
    Min, S. I.
    Heo, S. C.
    Ahn, Y. J.
    Hwang, K-T
    Chung, J. K.
    PHLEBOLOGY, 2008, 23 (04) : 172 - 177
  • [36] Endovenous Laser Ablation in the Treatment of Small Saphenous Varicose Veins: Does Site of Access Influence Early Outcomes?
    Samuel, Nehemiah
    Wallace, T.
    Carradice, D.
    Shahin, Y.
    Mazari, F. A. K.
    Chetter, I. C.
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 46 (04) : 310 - 314
  • [37] Endovenous ablation of refluxing saphenous and perforating veins
    Proebstle, Thomas
    van den Bos, Renate
    VASA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR MEDICINE, 2017, 46 (03) : 159 - 166
  • [38] Retrograde mechanochemical ablation of the small saphenous vein for the treatment of a venous ulcer
    Moore, Hayley M.
    Lane, Tristan R. A.
    Franklin, Ian J.
    Davies, Alun H.
    VASCULAR, 2014, 22 (05) : 375 - 377
  • [39] A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Thrombotic Events Following Endovenous Thermal Ablation of the Great Saphenous Vein
    Healy, Donagh A.
    Kimura, Shiori
    Power, David
    Elhaj, Abubaker
    Abdeldaim, Yasser
    Cross, Keith S.
    McGreal, Gerard T.
    Burke, Paul E.
    Moloney, Tony
    Manning, Brian J.
    Kavanagh, Eamon G.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 56 (03) : 410 - 424
  • [40] Comparative Outcomes of Different Endovenous Thermal Ablation Systems on Great and Small Saphenous Vein Insufficiency: Long-Term Results
    Weiss, Robert A.
    Weiss, Margaret A.
    Eimpunth, Sasima
    Wheeler, Sandra
    Udompunturak, Suthipol
    Beasley, Karen L.
    LASERS IN SURGERY AND MEDICINE, 2015, 47 (02) : 156 - 160