Gross anatomical features of the tongue, lingual skeleton and laryngeal mound of Rhea americana (Palaeognathae, Aves): morpho-functional considerations

被引:0
作者
Martina Crole
John Soley
机构
[1] University of Pretoria,Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science
来源
Zoomorphology | 2012年 / 131卷
关键词
Tongue; Laryngeal mound; Morphology; Function;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The tongue body of Rhea americana is triangular and partially pigmented with each caudo-lateral margin displaying a round, sub-divided lingual papilla. The tongue root is a smooth, non-pigmented tract of mucosa. The tongue body is supported by the paraglossum and distal half of the rostral projection of the basihyal (RPB), and the tongue root by the proximal half of the RPB, body of the basihyal and proximal ceratobranchials. An urohyal is absent; however, peculiar to R. americana, the caudal margin of the cricoid body displays a median projection, which may represent the remnant of the urohyal incorporated into the cricoid. The laryngeal mound is less elevated, the arytenoid cartilages are smaller than in other ratites, and the caudal margin displays pharyngeal papillae that vary in shape and number. The unique morphology of the lingual skeleton and its positioning within the tongue of R. americana, the rostral insertion of the M. ceratoglossus, the absence of the urohyal (enhanced ventroflexion) and the caudal positioning and mobile attachment of the ensheathed basihyal to the paraglossum would appear to allow independent movement of the tongue body relative to the hyobranchial apparatus. Additionally, the deeply indented base and rostral oval opening in the paraglossum limits the length of cartilage present in the midline of the tongue body. This may allow the tongue the necessary flexibility for the lingual papillae to clean the choana. The cleaning action of the tongue would occur simultaneously with the previously described role of this organ and associated structures during feeding. Thus, the so-called reduced, ancestral tongue of R. americana may be structurally and functionally more complex than previously believed.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 273
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Bailey TA(1997)Comparative morphology of the alimentary tract and its glandular derivatives of captive bustards J Anat 191 387-398
  • [2] Mensah-Brown EP(1984)Comparative gross anatomy of ratites Zoo Biol 3 133-144
  • [3] Samour JH(2009)Morphology of the tongue of the emu ( Onderstepoort J Vet Res 76 335-345
  • [4] Naldo J(2009)). I. Gross anatomical features and topography Onderstepoort J Vet Res 76 347-361
  • [5] Lawrence P(2010)Morphology of the tongue of the emu ( Anat Hist Embr 39 207-218
  • [6] Garner A(2010)). II. Histological features Anat Hist Embr 39 355-365
  • [7] Cho P(2011)Gross morphology of the intra-oral Acta Zool (Stockholm) 92 206-215
  • [8] Brown B(1933), oropharynx and proximal oesophagus of the emu ( Boll Musei Zool Anat Comp 43 313-323
  • [9] Anderson M(1972)) Anat Anz 132 250-265
  • [10] Crole MR(1991)Surface morphology of the emu ( J Zoo Wildlife Med 22 204-227