Automated Testing and Characterization of Additive Manufacturing (ATCAM)

被引:0
作者
Arash Alex Mazhari
Randall Ticknor
Sean Swei
Stanley Krzesniak
Mircea Teodorescu
机构
[1] University of California,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
[2] The Engineering Directorate at NASA Ames Research Center,Aeronautics and Astronautics Department
[3] Moffett Field,Department of Aerospace Engineering
[4] Stanford University,Department of Aerospace Engineering
[5] Khalifa University,undefined
[6] San Jose State University,undefined
来源
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance | 2021年 / 30卷
关键词
additive manufacturing; advanced characterization; automated testing; computational materials design; fused deposition modeling; machine learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The sensitivity of additive manufacturing (AM) to the variability of feedstock quality, machine calibration, and accuracy drives the need for frequent characterization of fabricated objects for a robust material process. The constant testing is fiscally and logistically intensive, often requiring coupons that are manufactured and tested in independent facilities. As a step toward integrating testing and characterization into the AM process while reducing cost, we propose the automated testing and characterization of AM (ATCAM). ATCAM is configured for fused deposition modeling (FDM) and introduces the concept of dynamic coupons to generate large quantities of basic AM samples. An in situ actuator is printed on the build surface to deploy coupons through impact, which is sensed by a load cell system utilizing machine learning (ML) to correlate AM data. We test ATCAM’s ability to distinguish the quality of three PLA feedstock at differing price points by generating and comparing 3000 dynamic coupons in 10 repetitions of 100 coupon cycles per material. ATCAM correlated the quality of each feedstock and visualized fatigue of in situ actuators over each testing cycle. Three ML algorithms were then compared, with Gradient Boost regression demonstrating a 71% correlation of dynamic coupons to their parent feedstock and provided confidence for the quality of AM data ATCAM generates.
引用
收藏
页码:6862 / 6873
页数:11
相关论文
共 142 条
  • [1] Anderegg DA(2019)In-Situ Monitoring of Polymer Flow Temperature and Pressure in Extrusion Based Additive Manufacturing Addit. Manuf. 26 76-83
  • [2] Bryant HA(2015)Additive Manufacturing of Materials: Opportunities and Challenges MRS Bull. 40 1154-1161
  • [3] Ruffin DC(2014)The Roadmap for Additive Manufacturing and its Impact 3D Print. Addit. Manuf. 1 6-9
  • [4] Skrip SM(2016)Effects of Filament Diameter Tolerances in Fused Filament Fabrication IU J. Undergrad. Res. 2 44-47
  • [5] Fallon JJ(2015)Design, Manufacture and Test of a Prototype for a Parabolic Trough Collector for Industrial Process Heat Renew. Energy 74 727-736
  • [6] Gilmer EL(2017)Cost Models of Additive Manufacturing: A Literature Review Int. J. Ind. Eng. Comput. 8 263-283
  • [7] Bortner MJ(2014)3d Opportunity: Additive Manufacturing Paths to Performance, Innovation and Growth Deloitte Rev. 14 5-19
  • [8] Babu SS(2018)Automated Process Monitoring in 3d Printing Using Supervised Machine Learning Procedia Manuf. 26 865-870
  • [9] Love L(2020)M3diseen: A Novel Machine Learning Approach for Predicting the 3d Printability of Medicines Int. J. Pharmaceut. 590 119837-445
  • [10] Dehoff R(2016)Review of In-situ Process Monitoring and In-situ Metrology for Metal Additive Manufacturing Mater. Des. 95 431-466