Adolescent risk behavior patterns: Effects of structured time-use, interpersonal connections, self-system characteristics, and socio-demographic influences

被引:0
作者
Mancini J.A. [1 ]
Huebner A.J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Human Development, Virginia Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg
[2] Department of Human Development, Virginia Polytech. Inst. State Univ., N. Virginia Grad. Ctr., Falls C.
关键词
Adolescents; Protective Factors; Risk Behavior; Structured Time-Use;
D O I
10.1007/s10560-004-6409-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The relationships between risk behaviors and factors representing multiple ecological layers are examined among a sample of youth in grades seven through 12 (n = 2,701). Our primary interest is in the relationship between structured time-use as a protective factor and youth risk behavior patterns. Two other layers of protective factors are also examined, those dealing with interpersonal connections and with self-system characteristics. Concomitant demographic factors in the study are age, ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status. Stepwise multiple regression analysis reveals that less risk behavior is associated with greater attachment to school, greater school success, closer relationships with parents, and greater participation in structured time-use; significant predictors of more risk behavior are being older, being male, and having one good friend. Implications for professional practice include employing a comprehensive, ecological approach to prevention and intervention, and enacting social support initiatives at multiple levels.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 668
页数:21
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Agnew R., Petersen D.M., Leisure and delinquency, Social Problems, 36, 4, pp. 332-350, (1989)
[2]  
Baldwin C.K., Theory, program, and outcomes: Assessing the challenges of evaluating at-risk youth recreation programs, Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 18, 1, pp. 19-33, (2000)
[3]  
Blum R.W., Beuhring T., Shew M.L., Bearinger L.H., Sieving R.E., Resnick M.D., The effects of race/ethnicity, income, and family structure on adolescent risk behaviors, American Journal of Public Health, 90, pp. 1879-1884, (2000)
[4]  
Bogenschneider K., An ecological risk/protective theory for building prevention programs, policies, and community capacity to support youth, Family Relations, 45, pp. 127-138, (1996)
[5]  
Borden L.M., Donnermeyer J.F., Scheer S.D., The influence of extra-curricular activities and peer influence on substance use, Adolescent and Family Health, 2, 1, pp. 12-19, (2001)
[6]  
Bowen N.K., Bowen G.L., The effects of home microsystem risk factors and school microsystem protective factors on student academic performance and affective investment in schooling, Social Work in Education, 20, 4, pp. 219-231, (1998)
[7]  
Bronfenbrenner U., Developmental ecology through space the time: A future perspective, Examining Lives in Context: Perspectives on the Ecology of Human Development, pp. 619-647, (1995)
[8]  
Cohen J., A power primer, Psychological Bulletin, 112, 1, pp. 155-159, (1992)
[9]  
Demo D., Acock A., Family structure, family process and adolescent well-being, Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, pp. 457-488, (1996)
[10]  
Eamon M.K., Effects of poverty on mathematics and reading achievement of young adolescents, Journal of Early Adolescence, 22, pp. 48-74, (2002)