Abdominal imaging utilization in the emergency department: Trends over two decades

被引:38
作者
Raja A.S. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Mortele K.J. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Hanson R. [1 ,3 ]
Sodickson A.D. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Zane R. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Khorasani R. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Center for Evidence-Based Imaging, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
[2] Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
[3] Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
[4] Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
关键词
Emergency Department; Emergency Department Visit; Abdominal Imaging; Emergency Department Patient; Current Procedural Terminology;
D O I
10.1186/1865-1380-4-19
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To assess patterns of use of abdominal imaging in the emergency department (ED) from 1990 to 2009. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data on adult ED patients treated between 1990 and 2009 at our university-affiliated quaternary care institution. Examinations were coded by abdominal imaging modality: x-ray, sonography, CT, or MRI. Proportional costs for each imaging modality were evaluated using relative value units (RVUs). Chisquare tests were used to assess for significant trends. Results: The intensity of abdominal imaging per 1,000 ED visits increased 19.3% from 1990-2009 (p = 0.0050). The number of abdominal CT scans per 1,000 ED visits increased 17.5-fold (p < 0.0001). Similarly, the number of abdominal MRIs per 1,000 ED visits increased from 0 to 1.0 (p < 0.0001), and the number of abdominal sonographs per 1,000 ED visits increased 51.6% (p = 0.0198). However, the number of x-ray examinations per 1,000 ED visits decreased 81.6% (p < 0.0001). Abdominal imaging RVUs per 1,000 ED visits increased 2.7-fold (p < 0.0001), due primarily to CT imaging, which accounted for 14% of RVUs in 1990 and 76% of RVUs in 2009. Conclusions: The intensity of abdominal imaging examinations per 1,000 ED visits and the number of abdominal imaging RVUs increased significantly over a 20-year period. CT replaced x-ray as the most common abdominal imaging modality for evaluation of ED patients. In light of these increasing costs as well as the increased radiation exposure of CT, clinical decision rules and computerized decision support may be needed to ensure appropriate utilization of abdominal CT in the ED. © 2011 Raja et al; licensee Springer.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [21] Kennish S.J., Bhatnagar P., Wah T.M., Bush S., Irving H.C., Is the KUB radiograph redundant for investigating acute ureteric colic in the non-contrast enhanced computed tomography era?, Clin Radiol, 63, pp. 1131-1135, (2008)
  • [22] Helling T.S., Wilson J., Augustosky K., The utility of focused abdominal ultrasound in blunt abdominal trauma: A reappraisal, Am J Surg, 194, (2007)
  • [23] Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
  • [24] Stiell I.G., Clement C.M., Grimshaw J., Brison R.J., Rowe B.H., Schull M.J., Lee J.S., Brehaut J., McKnight R.D., Eisenhauer M.A., Dreyer J., Letovsky E., Rutledge T., MacPhall I., Ross S., Shah A., Perry J.J., Holroyd B.R., Ip U., Lesiuk H., Wells G.A., Implementation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule: Prospective 12 centre cluster randomised trial, BMJ, 339, (2009)