Detection of renal allograft dysfunction with characteristic protein fingerprint by serum proteomic analysis

被引:0
作者
Minmin Wang
Qiu Jin
Haiyan Tu
Youying Mao
Jiekai Yu
Ying Chen
Zhangfei Shou
Qiang He
Jianyong Wu
Shu Zheng
Jianghua Chen
机构
[1] Zhejiang University,The Kidney Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical College
[2] The Third Grade Laboratory,Kidney Disease Immunology Laboratory
[3] State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Key Laboratory of Multiple Organ Transplantation
[4] Ministry of Health,Cancer Institute
[5] Zhejiang University,undefined
来源
International Urology and Nephrology | 2011年 / 43卷
关键词
Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS); Proteome; Renal allograft dysfunction; Acute rejection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study aimed to diagnose renal allograft dysfunction with specific biomarkers by serum proteomic analysis. Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS) and bioinformatics (support vector machine and leave-one cross validation) were used to analyze serum proteome. Enrolled patients included 38 biopsy-proved acute rejection (BPAR), 10 acute tubular necrosis (ATN), 24 subclinical rejection (SCR) and 29 stable control recipients verified by protocol biopsy. A characteristic protein profile can be detected in each renal allograft dysfunction group. BPAR patients were differentiated from stable patients with markers of 9710.1, 4971, 6675.5, 8563.8, 6709.2, 9319 and 4476.7 Da with high sensitivity and specificity. ATN can be clearly distinguished from BPAR and stable control. Subclinical rejection differentiated from stable control with markers of 9193.1, 2759.1, 8464.6 Da. The independent blind test yielded with high specificity and sensitivity for each group. Serum proteome analysis by SELDI-TOF MS combined with bioinformatics in renal allograft dysfunction is valuable and promising. Specific markers were detected in each group. Identification of these proteins may prove useful as diagnostic markers for allograft dysfunction and better to elucidate the mechanism of acute rejection.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1017
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Nankivell BJ(2006)Chronic allograft nephropathy: current concepts and future directions Transplantation 815 643-654
[2]  
Chapman JR(2005)Chronic allograft nephropathy Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 143 229-234
[3]  
Cornell LD(2005)Risk factors for chronic allograft nephropathy after renal transplantation: a protocol biopsy study Kidney Int 671 341-348
[4]  
Colvin RB(2003)Chronic allograft nephropathy N Engl J Med 34924 2288-2290
[5]  
Schwarz A(2005)Clinical significance of an early protocol biopsy in living-donor renal transplantation: ten-year experience at a single center Am J Transplant 56 1354-1360
[6]  
Colvin RB(2003)The impact of repeated subclinical acute rejection on the progression of chronic allograft nephropathy J Am Soc Nephrol 144 1046-1052
[7]  
Choi BS(2005)Rejection–more than the eye can see N Engl J Med 35322 2394-2396
[8]  
Shishido S(2005)C4d as a significant predictor for humoral rejection in renal allografts Clin Transplant 196 785-791
[9]  
Strom TB(2004)The impact of early vascular rejection on late rejection in 1062 cadaveric renal transplant J Am Soc Nephrol 15 812-718
[10]  
Jianghua C(2004)Improved clinical outcomes in Chinese renal allograft recipients receiving lower dose immunosuppressants Transplantation 785 713-2351