Students Vote: A Comparative Study of Student Perceptions of Three Popular Web-Based Student Response Systems

被引:0
|
作者
Victoria Ingalls
机构
[1] Tiffin University,Mathematics Department
来源
Technology, Knowledge and Learning | 2020年 / 25卷
关键词
Student response system; Clickers; Socrative; TopHat; Learning Catalytics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One way to use formative feedback to increase student engagement is through a student response system (SRS). Originally appearing as classroom “clickers,” very little literature exists concerning the ease of use, usefulness and integration, and overall satisfaction of current SRS software smartphone applications. Using the technology acceptance model as a guide, this study uses a mixed methods approach concerning student perceptions of three distinct SRS used in multiple sections of a university undergraduate statistics course. The quantitative results demonstrated significant differences between SRS, while follow-up qualitative questions clarified the Likert-scale data. “All else being equal, the easier system is to interact with, the less effort needed to operate it, the more effort one can allocate the other activities” (Davis 1989, p. 334). With all data considered, students preferred the Socrative app over both TopHat and Learning Catalytics.
引用
收藏
页码:557 / 567
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Students Vote: A Comparative Study of Student Perceptions of Three Popular Web-Based Student Response Systems
    Ingalls, Victoria
    TECHNOLOGY KNOWLEDGE AND LEARNING, 2020, 25 (03) : 557 - 567
  • [2] USAGE OF A WEB-BASED STUDENT RESPONSE SYSTEM (SRS) IN THE CLASSROOM: AN ANALYSIS OF ACCOUNTING STUDENTS' PERCEPTION
    Nasu, Vitor Hideo
    Afonso, Luis Eduardo
    Nogueira, Daniel Ramos
    REVISTA EVIDENCIACAO CONTABIL & FINANCAS, 2021, 9 (01): : 134 - 151
  • [3] A systematic literature review of web-based student response systems: Advantages and challenges
    Kocak, Omer
    EDUCATION AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 27 (02) : 2771 - 2805
  • [4] EXPERIENCES WITH USE OF WEB-BASED STUDENT RESPONSE SERVICES FOR IPOD TOUCH AND IPHONE
    Stav, John B.
    Nielsen, Kjetil L.
    Hansen-Nygard, Gabrielle
    Thorseth, Trond M.
    Bergh, Roger
    Bjorkli, Knut
    Arnesen, Ketil
    Pein, Raoul P.
    Lu, Joan
    4TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED 2010), 2010, : 2307 - 2316
  • [5] Student Response Systems: Keeping the Students Engaged
    Osterman, Anne C.
    COLLEGE & UNDERGRADUATE LIBRARIES, 2007, 14 (04) : 49 - 57
  • [6] CRiSP: An Instrument for Assessing Student Perceptions of Classroom Response Systems
    Alice M. Richardson
    Peter K. Dunn
    Christine McDonald
    Florin Oprescu
    Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2015, 24 : 432 - 447
  • [7] CRiSP: An Instrument for Assessing Student Perceptions of Classroom Response Systems
    Richardson, Alice M.
    Dunn, Peter K.
    McDonald, Christine
    Oprescu, Florin
    JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 24 (04) : 432 - 447
  • [8] EVALUATING THE INFLUENCE OF STUDENT RESPONSE SYSTEMS ON UNIVERSITY STUDENTS' LEARNING
    Tee, Kelly P. L.
    Teo, Pauline H. L.
    Rasiah, Ratneswary
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 14 : 111 - 119
  • [9] Integrating Student Response Technology into a Large Undergraduate Course: Students' Perceptions of their Motivations and Feedback
    Matteson, Scott
    Grant, Michael M.
    TECHTRENDS, 2024, 68 (06) : 1013 - 1032
  • [10] Students Perceptions on Teaching Design of Power Electronics Using Student-Response Systems: Thematic Content Analysis of Interviews
    Peftitsis, Dimosthenis
    Mavroudi, Anna
    IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 64059 - 64071