Investigating Strategies for Pre-Class Content Learning in a Flipped Classroom

被引:0
作者
Jamie L. Jensen
Emily A. Holt
Jacob B. Sowards
T. Heath Ogden
Richard E. West
机构
[1] Brigham Young University,Department of Biology
[2] University of Northern Colorado,School of Biological Sciences
[3] Utah Valley University,Department of Biology
[4] Brigham Young University,Department of Instructional Psychology and Technology
来源
Journal of Science Education and Technology | 2018年 / 27卷
关键词
Flipped classroom; Undergraduate; Active learning; Content learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In a flipped classroom model, learning of basic content is shifted before class while in-class time is used for concept application. Empirical and controlled research studies are lacking on the best strategies to provide the necessary pre-class content instruction. In this study, we tested three methods of pre-class content learning—interactive online tutorials, video lectures, and textbook-style readings—while holding the content and the in-class application activities constant. Identical introductory, non-majors biology classes were manipulated at both a public, open-enrollment institution and a private, highly selective institution. We found that video lectures offer a small advantage to overall student learning over interactive tutorials or textbook-style readings. Although our two populations differed in their ability to effectively learn from pre-class activities, through a student-centered flipped classroom approach, students at both institutions demonstrated equal learning gains by the final assessment. Potential reasons for some observed differences are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 535
页数:12
相关论文
共 151 条
[1]  
Abeysekera L(2015)Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: definition, rationale and a call for research Higher Education Research and Development 34 1-14
[2]  
Dawson P(2014)It’s not about seat time: blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms Computers in Education 78 227-236
[3]  
Baepler P(2011)Content vs. learning: an old dichotomy in science courses Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 15 33-44
[4]  
Walker JD(1998)Textbooks and Teaching: A Lesson from Students Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 53 4-17
[5]  
Driessen M(2016)The evidence for ‘flipping out’: a systematic review of the flipped classroom in nursing education Nurse Education Today 38 15-21
[6]  
Bergstrom G(1991)Dual coding theory and education Educational Psychology Review 3 149-210
[7]  
Besser Donna(2004)The extent to which psychology students read textbooks: a multiple class analysis of reading across the psychology curriculum Journal of Instructional Psychology 31 227-232
[8]  
Stone Gerald(1984)Peer education: the untapped potential Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 5 331-343
[9]  
Nan Luan(2013)Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course Educational Technology Research and Development 61 563-580
[10]  
Betihavas V(2015)The flipped classroom for teaching organic chemistry in small classes: is it effective? Chemistry Education Research and Practice 16 179-186