Upgrading of Gleason score 6 prostate cancers on biopsy after prostatectomy in the low and intermediate tPSA range

被引:0
作者
D Colleselli
A E Pelzer
E Steiner
S Ongarello
G Schaefer
G Bartsch
C Schwentner
机构
[1] University of Tuebingen,Department of Urology
[2] University Hospital Mannheim,Department of Urology
[3] Medical University of Innsbruck,Department of Urology
[4] University of Innsbruck,Department of Pathology
来源
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases | 2010年 / 13卷
关键词
Gleason score; core biopsy; radical prostatectomy; upgrading;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When offering watchful waiting or active monitoring protocols to prostate cancer (PCa) patients, differentiation between Gleason scores (GS) 6 and 7 at biopsy is important. However, upgrading after prostatectomy is common. We investigated the impact of different PSA levels on misclassification in the PSA range of 2–3.9 and 4–10 ng ml−1. A total of 448 patients with GS 6 PCa on prostate biopsy were evaluated by comparing biopsy and prostatectomy GS. Possible over diagnosis was defined as GS <7, pathological stage pT2a and negative surgical margins, and possible under diagnosis was defined as pT3a or greater, or positive surgical margins; the percentage of over- or under diagnosis was determined for correctly and upgraded tumors after prostatectomy. A match between biopsy and prostatectomy GS was found in 210 patients (46.9%). Patients in the PSA range of 2.0–3.9 and 4.0–10.0 ng ml−1 were upgraded in 32.6 and 44.0%, respectively. Over diagnosis was more common than under diagnosis (23.2% vs 15.6%). When upgraded there was a significant increase in under diagnosis. As almost 40% of GS 6 tumors on biopsy are GS 7 or higher after surgery with a significant rise in under diagnosis there is a risk of misclassification and subsequent delayed or even insufficient treatment, when relying on favorable biopsy GS.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 185
页数:3
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Gleason DF(2002)Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging J Urol 167 953-958
[2]  
Mellinger GT(1996)Analysis of risk factors for progression in patients with pathologically confined prostate cancers after radical retropubic prostatectomy J Urol 156 137-143
[3]  
Lerner SE(2001)Use of Gleason score, prostate specific antigen, seminal vesicle and margin status to predict biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy J Urol 165 119-125
[4]  
Blute ML(2006)Prostate cancers scored as Gleason 6 on prostate biopsy are frequently Gleason 7 tumors at radical prostatectomy: implication on outcome J Urol 176 979-984
[5]  
Bergstralh EJ(1995)Free, complexed and total serum prostate specific antigen: the establishment of appropriate reference ranges for their concentrations and ratios J Urol 154 1090-1095
[6]  
Bostwick DG(2005)Prostate cancer detection in men with prostate specific antigen 4–10 ng/ml using a combined approach of contrast enhanced color Doppler targeted and systematic biopsy J Urol 173 1926-1929
[7]  
Eickholt JT(2007)Under diagnosis and over diagnosis of prostate cancer in a screening population with serum PSA 2–10 ng/ml J Urol 178 93-97
[8]  
Zincke H(1998)Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer JAMA 280 969-974
[9]  
Blute ML(2003)National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for the management of prostate cancer Urology 61 14-24
[10]  
Bergstralh EJ(2006)Role of prostate biopsy schemes in accurate prediction of Gleason scores Urology 67 379-383