Is antegrade nailing a proper option in 2- and 3-part proximal humeral fractures?

被引:13
作者
Congia S. [1 ]
Palmas A. [1 ]
Marongiu G. [1 ]
Capone A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Clinica Ortopedica, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, Viale Lungo Mare Poetto 12, Cagliari, Sardegna
关键词
Fractures; Intramedullary nailing; Outcomes; Proximal humerus; Shoulder; Treatment;
D O I
10.1007/s12306-019-00610-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To report our experience with antegrade short locked intramedullary nail for treatment of proximal humeral fractures and to review the current literature. Materials and methods: From January 2012 to July 2013, 41 patients affected by two and three-part proximal humeral fractures were treated with surgical internal fixation with short locked intramedullary nails. Outcome analysis included standard clinical follow-up, Constant shoulder score and plain radiographs. The mean follow-up was 30 months (range 24–42). Moreover, a review of the literature was carried out. Results: The mean Constant shoulder score was 81.5, excellent functional outcomes in 24/38 patients. All the fractures healed in an average time of 3.7 months. Five patients underwent additional operations, complications included hardware penetration into the joint (n = 2), backed out screw (n = 1), shoulder impingement due to protrusion of the nail (n = 2) and superficial infection (n = 1). The literature review showed 530 patients affected by proximal humeral fracture and treated with intramedullary nail with mean age of 65 years, mean follow-up of 22.2 months and a Constant shoulder score of 72.9 points; the major complications reported were backing out of the screws, shoulder impingement and joint protrusion of the screws. Conclusions: Antegrade short locked intramedullary nail allows stable fixation, minimal soft tissue dissection, early mobilization of the shoulder and good outcomes. It is an efficacious therapeutic solution for 2- and 3-part proximal humeral fractures. © 2019, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli.
引用
收藏
页码:179 / 185
页数:6
相关论文
共 51 条
  • [1] Court-Brown C.M., Caesar B., Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review, Injury, 37, 8, pp. 691-697, (2006)
  • [2] Court-Brown C.M., Garg A., McQueen M.M., The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures, Acta Orthop Scand, 72, 4, pp. 365-371, (2001)
  • [3] Roux A., Decroocq L., El Batti S., Bonnevialle N., Moineau G., Trojani C., Et al., Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures managed in a trauma center, OrthopTraumatolSurg Res, 98, 6, pp. 715-719, (2012)
  • [4] Holroyd C., Cooper C., Dennison E., Epidemiology of osteoporosis, Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab, 22, 5, pp. 671-685, (2008)
  • [5] Piirtola M., Vahlberg T., Lopponen M., Raiha I., Isoaho R., Kivela S.L., Fractures as predictors of excess mortality in the aged-a population-based study with a 12-year follow-up, Eur J Epidemiol, 23, 11, pp. 747-755, (2008)
  • [6] Clinton J., Franta A., Polissar N.L., Neradilek B., Mounce D., Fink H.A., Et al., Proximal humeral fracture as a risk factor for subsequent hip fractures, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91, 3, pp. 503-511, (2009)
  • [7] Chu S.P., Kelsey J.L., Keegan T.H., Sternfeld B., Prill M., Quesenberry C.P., Et al., Risk factors for proximal humerus fracture, Am J Epidemiol, 160, 4, pp. 360-367, (2004)
  • [8] Khatib O., Onyekwelu I., Zuckerman J.D., The incidence of proximal humeral fractures in New York State from 1990 through 2010 with an emphasis on operative management in patients aged 65 years or older, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 23, 9, pp. 1356-1362, (2014)
  • [9] Bell J.E., Leung B.C., Spratt K.F., Koval K.J., Weinstein J.D., Goodman D.C., Et al., Trends and variation in incidence, surgical treatment, and repeat surgery of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 93, 2, pp. 121-131, (2011)
  • [10] Werner B.C., Griffin J.W., Yang S., Brockmeier S.F., Gwathmey F.W., Obesity is associated with increased postoperative complications after operative management of proximal humerus fractures, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 24, pp. 593-600, (2015)