Implication of modified MELD scores for postdischarge prognosis in hospitalized patients with heart failure

被引:0
作者
Masayuki Gotou
Atsushi Suzuki
Tsuyoshi Shiga
Noriko Kikuchi
Nobuhisa Hagiwara
机构
[1] Tokyo Women’s Medical University,Department of Cardiology
[2] The Jikei University School of Medicine,Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
来源
Heart and Vessels | 2023年 / 38卷
关键词
Ejection fraction; Heart failure; Hospitalization; MELD; Prognosis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We evaluated whether modified Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores are useful for predicting the postdischarge prognosis in hospitalized patients with heart failure (HF) who are discharged alive. The MELD-XI and MELD-Na scores were calculated at discharge for a total of 1156 patients in the HIJ-HF II study. We also studied 3 groups on the basis of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): the HFrEF (LVEF < 40%), HFmrEF (LVEF 40–49%) and HFpEF (LVEF ≥ 50%) groups. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and the secondary outcome was rehospitalization due to worsening HF. The median MELD-XI and MELD-Na scores were 12 and 14, respectively. After a median follow-up of 19 months, there were significantly higher rates of all-cause mortality in patients with MELD-XI scores ≥ 12 than in those with MELD-XI scores < 12; there were also higher rates of all-cause mortality in patients with MELD-Na scores ≥ 14 than in those with MELD-Na scores < 14 (both log-rank p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence function based on a competing risks model showed a higher rate of rehospitalization due to worsening HF in patients with MELD-XI scores ≥ 12 than in those with MELD-XI scores < 12 and a higher rate of rehospitalization due to worsening HF in those with MELD-Na scores ≥ 14 than in those with MELD-Na scores < 14 (both Gray’s test p < 0.001). The adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality for patients with MELD-XI scores ≥ 12 and those with MELD-Na scores ≥ 14 were 2.07 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25–3.44] and 2.79 [95% CI 1.63–4.79], respectively, in the HFrEF group; however, the HRs were not significant in the HFmrEF or HFpEF groups. Thus, MELD-XI and MELD-Na scores may be useful for predicting prognosis in hospitalized HF patients who are discharged alive, especially for those in the HFrEF group.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 542
页数:7
相关论文
共 287 条
[1]  
Damman K(2015)The kidney in heart failure: an update Eur Heart J 36 1437-1444
[2]  
Testani JM(2019)Heart failure and liver disease: cardiohepatic interactions JACC Heart Fail 7 87-97
[3]  
Xanthopoulos A(2001)A model to predict survival in patients with end-stage liver disease Hepatology 33 464-470
[4]  
Starling RC(2007)The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) Hepatology 45 797-805
[5]  
Kitai T(2010)Model for end-stage liver disease score predicts left ventricular assist device operative transfusion requirements, morbidity, and mortality Circulation 121 214-220
[6]  
Triposkiadis F(2012)Liver dysfunction as a predictor of outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure requiring ventricular assist device support: use of the model of endstage liver disease (MELD) and MELD eXcluding INR (MELD-XI) scoring system J Heart Lung Transplant 31 601-610
[7]  
Kamath PS(2013)Hepatic dysfunction in ambulatory patients with heart failure: application of the MELD scoring system for outcome prediction J Am Coll Cardiol 61 2253-2261
[8]  
Wiesner RH(2016)Impaired hepato-renal function defined by the MELD XI score as prognosticator in acute heart failure Eur J Heart Fail 18 1518-1521
[9]  
Malinchoc M(2017)Implications of alternative hepatorenal prognostic scoring systems in acute heart failure (from DOSE-AHF and ROSE-AHF) Am J Cardiol 119 2003-2009
[10]  
Kremers W(2019)Hepatorenal dysfunction identifies high-risk patients with acute heart failure: insights from the RELAX-AHF trial ESC Heart Fail 6 1188-1198