Trends in antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy in subjects with type II diabetes: clinical effectiveness or clinical discretion?

被引:0
作者
M C Gulliford
J Charlton
R Latinovic
机构
[1] King's College London,Department of Public Health Sciences
来源
Journal of Human Hypertension | 2005年 / 19卷
关键词
type II diabetes mellitus; primary medical care; drug therapy; antihypertensive agents; lipids and antilipidaemic agents; statins;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Hypertension and lipid disorders in type II diabetes contribute to increased coronary risk, but optimal drug therapy has not been defined. We investigated primary care physicians choices of antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy for subjects with type II diabetes diagnosed with hypertension. Subjects were registered with 105 UK general practices in the General Practice Research Database and prescribed oral hypoglycaemic drugs for the first time between January 1993 and December 2001. We evaluated prescriptions for antihypertensive drugs in subjects with secondary diagnoses of hypertension in the first year following initiation of oral hypoglycaemic therapy. Data were analysed for 4519 diabetic subjects with diagnosed hypertension. Between 1993 and 2001, the proportion prescribed thiazide diuretics increased from 20 to 30%; angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors from 35 to 45% and angiotensin receptor blockers from 0 to 8%. The proportion of subjects prescribed lipid-lowering therapy increased from 8% in 1993 to 33% in 2001, with the proportion prescribed statins increasing from 1 to 30%. At different general practices, the proportion prescribed thiazide diuretics ranged from 0 to 52%, beta-blockers from 5 to 60%, ACE inhibitors from 15 to 81%, and statins from 0 to 50%. Variation between practices was not explained by adjusting for age, sex, prevalent coronary heart disease or study year. Trends in drug utilisation were consistent with the evolving evidence base but there were wide variations in drug utilisation between practices. A more consistent approach to drug selection might be associated with improved patient outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 117
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Kanaya AM(2002)Explaining the sex difference in coronary heart disease mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis Arch Int Med 162 1737-1745
[2]  
Grady D(2003)The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: The JNC 7 Report JAMA 289 2560-2572
[3]  
Barrett-Connor E(2004)British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 2004 (BHS-IV): summary BMJ 328 634-640
[4]  
Chobanian AV(1996)Greater reduction of urinary albumin excretion in hypertensive type II diabetic patients with incipient nephropathy by lisinopril than by nifedipine J Hum Hypertens 10 185-192
[5]  
Williams B(2001)The effect of irbesartan on the development of diabetic nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes N Engl J Med 345 870-878
[6]  
Agardh CD(1996)Long-term renoprotective effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. A 7-year follow-up study Arch Intern Med 156 286-289
[7]  
Parving HH(1995)Prevention of coronary heart disease with pravastatin in men with hypercholesterolemia. West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Group N Engl J Med 333 1301-1307
[8]  
Ravid M(1997)Cholesterol lowering with simvastatin improves prognosis of diabetic patients with coronary heart disease. A subgroup analysis of the Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) Diabetes Care 20 614-620
[9]  
Lang R(1997)The UK general practice research database Lancet 350 1097-1099
[10]  
Rachmani R(1991)Validation of information recorded on general practitioner based computerised data resource in the United Kingdom BMJ 302 766-768