Ecological Patterns and Biological Invasions: Using Regional Species Inventories in Macroecology

被引:0
作者
Marc W. Cadotte
Brad R. Murray
Jon Lovett-Doust
机构
[1] University of Tennessee,Complex Systems Group, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
[2] University of Technology Sydney,Institute for Water and Environmental Resource Management
[3] University of Windsor,Department of Biological Sciences
来源
Biological Invasions | 2006年 / 8卷
关键词
comparative studies; database analyses; ecological generalities; macroecology; plant invasions; phylogenetic analyses; predictability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Macroecology depends heavily on a comparative methodology in order to identify large-scale patterns and to test alternative hypotheses that might generate such patterns. With the advent and accessibility of large electronic databases of species and their life history and ecological attributes, ecologists have begun seeking generalities, and examining large-scale ecological hypotheses involving core themes of range, abundance and diversity. For example, combinations of ecological, life history and phylogenetic data have been analysed using large species sets to test hypotheses in invasion biology. Analysis of regional species inventories can contribute cogently to our understanding of invasions. Here we examine several ways in which database analysis is effective. We review 19 studies of comparative invasions biology, each using >100 species of plants in their analyses, and show that invader success is linked to seven correlates: short life cycle, abiotic (mostly wind) dispersal, large native range size, non-random taxonomic patterns (emphasizing certain families or orders), presence of clonal organs, occupying disturbed habitats, and earlier time of introduction. These phylogenetically influenced, comparative analyses using regional species inventories are only just beginning and have much potential.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 821
页数:12
相关论文
共 148 条
[1]  
Ackerly DD(1998)Leaf size, sapling allometry, and Corner’s Rules: phylogeny and correlated evolution in Maples ( American Naturalist 152 767-791
[2]  
Donoghue MJ(2003)) Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141 399-436
[3]  
Baker HG(1974)An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5 1-24
[4]  
Bell G(2001)The evolution of weeds Science 293 2413-2418
[5]  
Bierregaard RO(1992)Neutral macroecology Bioscience 42 859-866
[6]  
Lovejoy TE(2002)The biological dynamics of tropical rainforest fragments Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17 1-3
[7]  
Kapos V(1999)Taxonomic chauvinism Oikos 87 3-14
[8]  
Dos Santos AA(2001)Macroecology: progress and prospect Ecoscience 8 230-238
[9]  
Bonnet X(2002)Ecological and taxonomic differences between native and introduced plants of southwestern Ontario Ecoscience 9 397-407
[10]  
Besnard M(2004)Ecological and taxonomic differences between rare and common plants of southwestern Ontario Diversity and Distributions 10 135-141