GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using numerical risk factor bivariate model and its ensemble with linear multivariate regression and boosted regression tree algorithms

被引:0
作者
Alireza Arabameri
Biswajeet Pradhan
Khalil Rezaei
Masoud Sohrabi
Zahra Kalantari
机构
[1] Tarbiat Modares University,Department of Geomorphology
[2] University of Technology Sydney,Centre for Advanced Modelling and Geospatial Information Systems (CAMGIS), Faculty of Engineering and IT
[3] Sejong University,Department of Energy and Mineral Resources Engineering, Choongmu
[4] Kharazmi University,gwan
[5] Islamic Azad university of Urmia,Faculty of Earth Sciences
[6] Stockholm University,Department of Civil Engineering
来源
Journal of Mountain Science | 2019年 / 16卷
关键词
Landslide susceptibility; GIS; Remote sensing; Bivariate model; Multivariate model; Machine learning model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In this study, a novel approach of the landslide numerical risk factor (LNRF) bivariate model was used in ensemble with linear multivariate regression (LMR) and boosted regression tree (BRT) models, coupled with radar remote sensing data and geographic information system (GIS), for landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) in the Gorganroud watershed, Iran. Fifteen topographic, hydrological, geological and environmental conditioning factors and a landslide inventory (70%, or 298 landslides) were used in mapping. Phased array-type L-band synthetic aperture radar data were used to extract topographic parameters. Coefficients of tolerance and variance inflation factor were used to determine the coherence among conditioning factors. Data for the landslide inventory map were obtained from various resources, such as Iranian Landslide Working Party (ILWP), Forestry, Rangeland and Watershed Organisation (FRWO), extensive field surveys, interpretation of aerial photos and satellite images, and radar data. Of the total data, 30% were used to validate LSMs, using area under the curve (AUC), frequency ratio (FR) and seed cell area index (SCAI). Normalised difference vegetation index, land use/ land cover and slope degree in BRT model elevation, rainfall and distance from stream were found to be important factors and were given the highest weightage in modelling. Validation results using AUC showed that the ensemble LNRF-BRT and LNRFLMR models (AUC = 0.912 (91.2%) and 0.907 (90.7%), respectively) had high predictive accuracy than the LNRF model alone (AUC = 0.855 (85.5%)). The FR and SCAI analyses showed that all models divided the parameter classes with high precision. Overall, our novel approach of combining multivariate and machine learning methods with bivariate models, radar remote sensing data and GIS proved to be a powerful tool for landslide susceptibility mapping.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 618
页数:23
相关论文
共 218 条
[1]  
Ahlmer AK(2018)Soil moisture remote-sensing applications for identification of flood-prone areas along transport infrastructure Environmental Earth Sciences 77 533-1400
[2]  
Cavalli M(2017)Applying different scenarios for landslide spatial modeling using computational intelligence methods Environmental Earth Science 76 832-4049
[3]  
Hansson K(2017)Erodibility prioritization of sub-watersheds using morphometric parameters analysis and its mapping: A comparison among TOPSIS, VIKOR, SAW, and CF multi-criteria decision making models Science of the Total Environment 613–614 1385-1155
[4]  
Arabameri AR(2018)Spatial Modelling of Gully Erosion Using GIS and R Programing: A Comparison among Three Data Mining Algorithms Applied sciences 8 1369-942
[5]  
Pourghasemi HR(2018)GISbased gully erosion susceptibility mapping: a comparison among three data-driven models and AHP knowledge-based technique Environmental Earth Sciences 77 628-458
[6]  
Yamani M(2018)Spatial modelling of gully erosion using Evidential Belief Function, Logistic Regression and a new ensemble EBF-LR algorithm Land Degradation and Development 29 4035-177
[7]  
Arabameri A(2018)Identification of erosion-prone areas using different multicriteria decision-making techniques and GIS Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 9 1129-18
[8]  
Pourghasemi HR(2019)Gully erosion zonation mapping using integrated geographically weighted regression with certainty factor and random forest models in GIS Journal of environmental management 232 928-937
[9]  
Cerda A(2019)A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in Northern Iran Science of the Total Environment 660 443-44
[10]  
Arabameri A(2019)GIS-based groundwater potential mapping in Shahroud plain, Iran. A comparison among statistical (bivariate and multivariate), data mining and MCDM approaches Science of the Total Environment 658 160-1420