Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of DACA (XR5000): a novel inhibitor of topoisomerase I and II

被引:0
作者
C J Twelves
C Gardner
A Flavin
J Sludden
I Dennis
J de Bono
P Beale
P Vasey
C Hutchison
M A Macham
A Rodriguez
I Judson
N M Bleehen
机构
[1] Alexander Stone Building,CRC Department of Medical Oncology
[2] Garscube Estate,undefined
[3] Bearsden,undefined
[4] Data Centre,undefined
[5] Cancer Research Campaign,undefined
[6] 10 Cambridge Terrace,undefined
[7] MRC Clinical Oncology and Radiotherapy Unit,undefined
[8] Addenbrooke’s Hospital,undefined
[9] Royal Marsden Hospital,undefined
[10] Institute of Cancer Research,undefined
[11] Drug Development Section,undefined
[12] Block E,undefined
来源
British Journal of Cancer | 1999年 / 80卷
关键词
phase I; cytotoxic; pharmacokinetics; topoisomerase I; topoisomerase II;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
DACA, also known as XR5000, is an acridine derivative active against both topoisomerase I and II. In this phase I study, DACA was given as a 3-h intravenous infusion on 3 successive days, repeated every 3 weeks. A total of 41 patients were treated at 11 dose levels between 9 mg m–2 d–1 and the maximum tolerated dose of 800 mg m–2 day–1. The commonest, and dose-limiting, toxicity was pain in the infusion arm. One patient given DACA through a central venous catheter experienced chest pain with transient electrocardiogram changes, but no evidence of myocardial infarction. At the highest dose levels, several patients also experienced flushing, pain and paraesthesia around the mouth, eyes and nose and a feeling of agitation. Other side-effects, such as nausea and vomiting, myelosuppression, stomatitis and alopecia, were uncommon. There was one minor response but no objective responses. DACA pharmacokinetics were linear and did not differ between days 1 and 3. The pattern of toxicity seen with DACA is unusual and appears related to the mode of delivery. It is possible that higher doses of DACA could be administered using a different schedule of administration.
引用
收藏
页码:1786 / 1791
页数:5
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Abigerges D(1996)Phase I and pharmacology study of intoplicine (RP 60475; NSC 645008), a novel topoisomerase I and II inhibitor, in cancer patients Anticancer Drugs 7 166-174
[2]  
Armand J-P(1987)Potential anti-tumour agents. 50. In vivo solid tumour activity of derivatives of N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamide J Med Chem 30 664-669
[3]  
Chabot GG(1990)Design of DNA intercalators to overcome topoisomerase II-mediated multi-drug resistance J Natl Cancer Inst 82 398-402
[4]  
Bruno R(1995)Experimental solid tumour activity of N-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]acridine-4-carboxamide Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 36 224-248
[5]  
Bissery M-C(1992)Intraperitoneal administration of the anti-tumour agent of N-[2-(dimethylamino) ethyl] acridine-4-carboxamide in the mouse: bioavailability, pharmacokinetics and toxicity after a single dose Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 31 32-36
[6]  
Bayssas M(1989)Selectivity of N-[2-(dimethylamino) ethyl] acridine-4-carboxamide towards Lewis lung carcinoma and human tumour cell lines in vitro Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 25 271-277
[7]  
Klink-Alaki M(1993)In vitro assessment of N-[2-(dimethylamino) ethyl] acridine-4-carboxamide, a DNA-intercalating antitumour drug with reduced sensitivity to multidrug resistance Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 31 401-406
[8]  
Clavel M(1988)Camptothecin-resistant mutants of Chinese hamster ovary cells containing a resistant form of topoisomerase I Cancer Res 48 6404-6410
[9]  
Catimel G(1992)Effects of CPT-11 in combination with other anti-cancer agents in culture Int J Cancer 50 604-610
[10]  
Atwell GJ(1993)Phase I study of CPT-11 and etoposide in patients with refractory solid tumours J Clin Oncol 11 2030-2035