A framework for production of systematic review based briefings to support evidence-informed decision-making

被引:25
作者
Chambers D. [1 ]
Wilson P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, Heslington, York
关键词
Decision-making; Evidence briefings; Knowledge translation;
D O I
10.1186/2046-4053-1-32
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We have developed a framework for translating existing sources of synthesized and quality-assessed evidence, primarily systematic reviews, into actionable messages in the form of short accessible briefings. The service aims to address real-life problems in response to requests from decision-makers.Development of the framework was based on a scoping review of existing resources and our initial experience with two briefing topics, including models of service provision for young people with eating disorders. We also drew on previous experience in dissemination research and practice. Where appropriate, we made use of the SUPporting POlicy relevant Reviews and Trials (SUPPORT) tools for evidence-informed policymaking.Findings: To produce a product that it is fit for this purpose it has been necessary to go beyond a traditional summary of the available evidence relating to effectiveness. Briefings have, therefore, included consideration of cost effectiveness, local applicability, implications relating to local service delivery, budgets, implementation and equity. Our first evidence briefings produced under this framework cover diagnostic endoscopy by specialist nurses and integrated care pathways in mental healthcare settings.Conclusions: The framework will enable researchers to present and contextualize evidence from systematic reviews and other sources of synthesized and quality-assessed evidence. The approach is designed to address the wide range of questions of interest to decision-makers, especially those commissioning services or managing service delivery and organization in primary or secondary care. Evaluation of the use and usefulness of the evidence briefings we produce is an integral part of the framework and will help to fill a gap in the literature. © 2012 Chambers and Wilson; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Chambers D., Wilson P., Thompson C., Hanbury A., Farley K., Light K., Maximizing the impact of systematic reviews in healthcare decision-making: a systematic scoping review of knowledge translation resources, Milbank Q, 89, pp. 131-156, (2011)
[2]  
Lavis J.N., How can we support the use of systematic reviews in policymaking?, PLoS Med, 6, (2009)
[3]  
Hanbury A., Thompson C., Wilson P.M., Farley K., Chambers D., Warren E., Bibby J., Mannion R., Watt I.S., Gilbody S., Translating research into practice in Leeds and Bradford (TRiPLaB): a protocol for a programme of research, Implement Sci, 5, (2010)
[4]  
Lavis J., Davies H., Oxman A., Denis J.-L., Golden-Biddle K., Ferlie E., Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making, J Health Serv Res Policy, 10, SUPPL. 1, pp. 35-48, (2005)
[5]  
Sheldon T.A., Making evidence synthesis more useful for management and policy-making, J Health Serv Res Policy, 10, SUPPL. 1, pp. 1-5, (2005)
[6]  
Effective Health Care bulletins
[7]  
Lavis J.N., Oxman A.D., Grimshaw J., Johansen M., Boyko J.A., Lewin S., Fretheim A., SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 7: Finding systematic reviews, Health Res Policy Syst, 7, 1, (2009)
[8]  
Innvaer S., Vist G., Trommald M., Oxman A., Health policy-makers' perceptions of their use of evidence: a systematic review, J Health Serv Res Policy, 7, pp. 239-244, (2002)
[9]  
Rx for Change database
[10]  
McMaster Health Forum