Health professionals’ experiences with the implementation of a digital medication dispenser in home care services – a qualitative study

[1] Nakrem S(2018)Care relationships at stake? Home healthcare professionals' experiences with digital medicine dispensers - a qualitative study BMC Health Serv Res 18 26-222

[2] Solbjor M(2013)Older adults' satisfaction with a medication dispensing device in home care Informatics Health Soc Care 38 211-96

[3] Pettersen IN(2004)Developments in home help for elderly people in Denmark: the changing concept of home and institution Int J Soc Welf 13 89-140

[4] Kleiven HH(2015)“How do you care for technology?” – care professionals' experiences with assistive technology in care of the elderly Technol Forecasting Soc Change 93 133-e25

[5] Reeder B(2015)STS-inspired design to meet the challenges of modern aging. Welfare technology as a tool to promote user driven innovations or another way to keep older users hostage? Technological Forecasting & Social Change 93 82-57

[6] Demiris G(2015)By any means? Questioning the link between gerontechnological innovation and older people's wish to live at home Technological Forecasting & Social Change 93 32-105

[7] Marek KD(2018)Participatory Design in Gerontechnology: a systematic literature review The Gerontologist 59 e16-1433

[8] Lewinter M(2019)New perspectives on user participation in technology design processes: an interdisciplinary approach The Gerontologist 59 45-e86

[9] Saborowski M(2013)Technology identity: the role of sociotechnical representations in the adoption of medical devices Soc Sci Med 98 95-642

[10] Kollak I(2016)What was (also) at stake when a robot bathtub was implemented in a Danish elder center: a constructivist secondary qualitative analysis Qual Health Res 26 1424-407

[1] Nakrem S(2018)Care relationships at stake? Home healthcare professionals' experiences with digital medicine dispensers - a qualitative study BMC Health Serv Res 18 26-222

[2] Solbjor M(2013)Older adults' satisfaction with a medication dispensing device in home care Informatics Health Soc Care 38 211-96

[3] Pettersen IN(2004)Developments in home help for elderly people in Denmark: the changing concept of home and institution Int J Soc Welf 13 89-140

[4] Kleiven HH(2015)“How do you care for technology?” – care professionals' experiences with assistive technology in care of the elderly Technol Forecasting Soc Change 93 133-e25

[5] Reeder B(2015)STS-inspired design to meet the challenges of modern aging. Welfare technology as a tool to promote user driven innovations or another way to keep older users hostage? Technological Forecasting & Social Change 93 82-57

[6] Demiris G(2015)By any means? Questioning the link between gerontechnological innovation and older people's wish to live at home Technological Forecasting & Social Change 93 32-105

[7] Marek KD(2018)Participatory Design in Gerontechnology: a systematic literature review The Gerontologist 59 e16-1433

[8] Lewinter M(2019)New perspectives on user participation in technology design processes: an interdisciplinary approach The Gerontologist 59 45-e86

[9] Saborowski M(2013)Technology identity: the role of sociotechnical representations in the adoption of medical devices Soc Sci Med 98 95-642

[10] Kollak I(2016)What was (also) at stake when a robot bathtub was implemented in a Danish elder center: a constructivist secondary qualitative analysis Qual Health Res 26 1424-407