Faster quantum state decomposition with Tucker tensor approximation

被引:0
作者
Protasov Stanislav
Lisnichenko Marina
机构
[1] Innopolis University,Machine Learning and Knowledge Representation Lab
来源
Quantum Machine Intelligence | 2023年 / 5卷
关键词
Quantum state preparation; Tensor decomposition; NISQ; Tucker decomposition;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Researchers have put a lot of effort into reducing the gap between current quantum processing units (QPU) capabilities and their potential supremacy. One approach is to keep supplementary computations in the CPU, and use the QPU only for the core of the problem. In this work, we address the complexity of quantum algorithms of arbitrary quantum state initialization. QPUs do not outperform classical machines with existing precise initialization algorithms. Hence, many studies propose an approximate but robust quantum state initialization. Cutting a quantum state into a product of (almost) independent partitions with the help of CPU reduces the number of two-qubit gates, and correspondingly minimizes the loss of state fidelity in the quantum part of the algorithm. To find the least entangled qubits, current methods compute the singular value decomposition (SVD) for each qubit separately using the CPU. In this paper, we optimize CPU usage and memory resource bottlenecks. We consider Tucker tensor decomposition as an alternative to the CPU-based SVD in a single low-entangled qubit detection task without loss of solution quality. An iterative implementation of Tucker tensor decomposition replaces explicit applications of SVD as proposed in Araujo et al. (2021). This improvement gives both a theoretical and practical time complexity reduction for the circuit-preparation part of quantum algorithms working with vector data. We propose two implementations of our method; both of them outperform the SVD in time and memory for systems of at least ten qubits. We achieve an order faster implementation and two orders less memory usage for a system of 15 qubits.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Bharti K(2022)Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms Reviews of Modern Physics 94 035014-1278
  • [2] Cervera-Lierta A(2000)Distributed entanglement Phys. Rev. A 61 1253-5084
  • [3] Kyaw TH(2022)Matrix product state pre-training for quantum machine learning Quantum Science and Technology 7 5063-224
  • [4] Haug T(2000)A multilinear singular value decomposition SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 21 205-2054
  • [5] Alperin-Lea S(2015)Minimal rényi-ingarden-urbanik entropy of multipartite quantum states Entropy 17 2029-189
  • [6] Anand A(1965)Calculating the singular values and pseudo-inverse of a matrix Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Series B Numerical Analysis 2 164-1342
  • [7] Degroote M(2010)Hierarchical singular value decomposition of tensors SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications 31 070502-633
  • [8] Heimonen H(2009)Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 1324-2317
  • [9] Kottmann JS(1927)The expression of a tensor or a polyadic as a sum of products Journal of Mathematics and Physics 6 631-1561
  • [10] Menke T(2016)Quantum circuits for isometries Phys. Rev. A 93 2295-201