Use of the tarSys® for posterior lamellar grafting for lower eyelid malposition

被引:6
作者
Leonard J.H. [1 ]
Cohen A.J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Rush University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
[2] Private Practice Eyelid and Facial Plastic Surgery, Glenview, IL
[3] Oculoplastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Division of Ophthalmology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
关键词
Ectropion; Eyelid; Eyelid retraction; Oculoplastics; Posterior lamellar spacer graft; TarSys;
D O I
10.1007/s00238-013-0882-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Lower eyelid malposition is a common clinical finding encountered by the oculoplastic surgeon. We examine the short-termresults with the use of the tarSys spacer graft for the correction of lower eyelid malposition. Methods: A retrospective chart review of one surgeon's outcomes with use of tarSys spacer graft for lower eyelid malposition was conducted. Results: Preoperative margin-to-reflex distance 2 (MRD2) ranged from 8 to 15 mm with a mean of 9.5 mm (±2.4 mm) and median 8.25 mm. Mean postoperative MRD2 was 6.2 (±3.4 mm) ranging from 4 to 17 mm with a median of 5.0 mm. Improvement in MRD2 averaged 3.33 (±2.07 mm), range -2 to 6 mm, and a median of 3.25 mm. Preoperative lagophthalmos ranged from 0 to 10 mm with mean 3.9 (±3.6 mm) and a median of 3.0 mm. Mean postoperative lagophthalmos was 1.3 (±1.5 mm) ranging from 0 to 4 mm with a median of 0.7 mm. Improvement in lagophthalmos averaged 2.5 (±2.7 mm). Conclusions: The tarSys spacer graft should be thought of as a dependable allogenic implant for posterior lamellar support when correcting lower eyelid malposition. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 738
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Milz S., Neufang J., Higashiyama I., Putz R., Et al., An immunohistochemical study of the extracellular matrix of the tarsal plate in the upper eyelid in human beings, J Anat, 206, pp. 37-45, (2005)
  • [2] Kakizaki H., Malhotra R., Madge S.N., Selva D., Lower eyelid anatomy: An update, Ann Plast Surg, 63, pp. 344-351, (2009)
  • [3] Rafii A.A., Enepekides D.J., Upper and lower eyelid reconstruction: The year in review, Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 14, pp. 227-233, (2006)
  • [4] Korn B.S., Kikkawa D.O., Cohen S.R., Hartstein M., Et al., Treatment of lower eyelid malposition with dermis fat grafting, Ophthalmol, 115, pp. 744-751, (2008)
  • [5] Wearne M.J., Sandy C., Rose G.E., Pitts J., Et al., Autogenous hard palate mucosa: The ideal lower eyelid spacer?, Br J Ophthalmol, 85, pp. 1183-1187, (2001)
  • [6] Ozkaya O., Karsidag S., Egemen O., Akcal A.O., Sirvan S., Kabukcuoglu F., Comparative analysis of the nail xenografts with cartilage autografts in eyelid reconstruction, J Craniofac Surg, 23, pp. 1028-1031, (2012)
  • [7] Sullivan S.A., Dailey R.A., Graft contraction: A comparison of acellular dermis versus hard palate mucosa in lower eyelid surgery, Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg, 19, pp. 14-24, (2003)
  • [8] Badylak S.F., The extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction, Semin Cell Dev Biol, 13, pp. 377-383, (2001)
  • [9] Abraham G.A., Murray J., Billiar K., Sullivan S.J., Evaluation of the porcine intestinal collagen layer as a biomaterial, J Biomed Mater Res, 51, pp. 442-452, (2005)
  • [10] Raghavan D., Kropp B.P., Lin H.K., Zhang Y., Et al., Physical characteristics of small intestinal submucosa scaffolds are locationdependent, J Biomed Mater Res A, 73, pp. 90-96, (2005)