Effect of verticalization with Erigo® in the acute rehabilitation of severe acquired brain injury

被引:0
作者
Emilio Ancona
Annamaria Quarenghi
Marcello Simonini
Raoul Saggini
Stefano Mazzoleni
Antonio De Tanti
Donatella Saviola
Giovanni Pietro Salvi
机构
[1] “Quarenghi” Clinical Institute,Neurorehabilitation Unit
[2] “Gabriele d’Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara,School of Specialty in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
[3] Scuola Superiore “Sant’Anna”,The BioRobotics Institute
[4] “Santo Stefano” Riabilitazione,“Cardinal Ferrari” Rehabilitation Centre
来源
Neurological Sciences | 2019年 / 40卷
关键词
Severe acquired brain injury; sABI; Acute rehabilitation; Verticalization; Robotics; Erigo®;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The recovery of the orthostatism after a severe acquired brain injury (sABI) is an essential objective to pursue in order to avoid the occurrence of secondary complications resulting from prolonged immobilization to which the patient is subjected during the acute phase. This randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the effect of verticalization with the lower limb robot-assisted training system Erigo® versus conventional neurorehabilitation in 44 adult subjects affected by sequelae of sABI in the acute rehabilitation phase, related to cardiorespiratory signs and measures of impairment and activity. At the end of the study (20 treatment sessions, 5 sessions per week), in both groups of patients, there were no dropouts nor adverse events. In subject verticalized with Erigo®, there were no episodes of (pre)syncope from orthostatic hypotension nor postural orthostatic tachycardia and cardiorespiratory signs remained stable; moreover, there were no increase in muscle tone nor reduction in range of motion at lower limbs. Results obtained show improved outcomes on the whole and in a similar way in both groups; however, the improvement in scores of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, the Tinetti scale, and the Functional Independence Measure from the enrollment to the end of the treatment cycle being equal, the evaluation performed at the 10th session allows to establish that the improvement appears earlier in the intervention group and later in the control group. The more rapid recovery of impairments and some activities in subjects treated with Erigo® could allow a “time-saver” to devote to the rehabilitation of sensory-motor functions which are more complex and subordinated to the preliminary reacquisition of elementary postures and motor strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:2073 / 2080
页数:7
相关论文
共 263 条
[1]  
Nudo RJ(2001)Role of adaptive plasticity in recovery of function after damage to motor cortex Muscle Nerve 24 1000-1019
[2]  
Plautz EJ(2012)Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 26 923-931
[3]  
Frost SB(1996)Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct Science 272 1791-1794
[4]  
Krakauer JW(2004)Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke Prog Neurobiol 73 61-72
[5]  
Carmichael ST(2013)The interaction between training and plasticity in the post-stroke brain Curr Opin Neurol 26 609-616
[6]  
Corbett D(2006)Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke Stroke 37 2348-2353
[7]  
Wittenberg GF(1986)Stroke outcome research Stroke 17 358-362
[8]  
Nudo RJ(2002)Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature Arch Phys Med Rehabil 83 1629-1637
[9]  
Wise BM(2004)Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories Restor Neurol Neurosci 22 281-299
[10]  
SiFuentes F(2005)Plasticity and reorganization of the brain post stroke Top Stroke Rehabil 12 11-26