Erratum to: Arguing ‘for’ the Patient: Informed Consent and Strategic Maneuvering in Doctor–Patient Interaction

被引：0
作者：
Peter J. Schulz
Sara Rubinelli
机构：
[1] University of Lugano (CH),Institute of Communication & Health
来源：
Argumentation | 2015年 / 29卷
关键词：
Medical encounter; Info-suasive dialogue; Informed consent; Strategic maneuvering; Pragma-dialectical rules of critical discussion;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
As a way to advance integration between traditional readings of the medical encounter and argumentation theory, this article conceptualizes the doctor–patient interaction as a form of info-suasive dialogue. Firstly, the article explores the relevance of argumentation in the medical encounter in connection with the process of informed consent. Secondly, it discloses the risks inherent to a lack of reconciliation of the dialectical and rhetorical components in the delivery of the doctor’s advice, as especially resulting from the less-than-ideal conditions of the internal states of the doctor and the patient, and the lack of symmetry in their status.
引用
收藏
页码：481 / 491
页数：10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Brashers DH(1999)The patient self-advocacy scale (PSAS): Measuring involvement in health care decision making Health Communication 11 97-122
[2]  
Brashers DH(2000)Collective AIDS activism and individual’s perceived self-advocacy in physician–patient communication Human Communication Research 26 372-402
[3]  
Haas S(1998)Evidence-based decision-making: An argumentative approach International Journal of Medical Informatics 51 71-81
[4]  
Klingle R(2006)Understanding interpersonal communication processes across health contexts: Advances in the last decade and challenges for the next decade Journal of Health Communication 11 93-108
[5]  
Neidig J(2000)Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving. A case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53 1077-1115
[6]  
Dickinson H(2005)A Bayesian network coding scheme for annotating biomedical information presented to genetic counseling clients Journal of Biomedical Informatics 38 130-144
[7]  
Duggan A(1995)Doctor–patient communication: A review of the literature Social Science and Medicine 40 903-918
[8]  
Grasso A(1996)Physician recommendations and patient autonomy. Finding a balance between physician power and patient choice Annals of Internal Medicine 125 736-769
[9]  
Cawsey A(1992)Quantitative and qualitative approaches to the evaluation of the medical dialogue Social Science and Medicine 34 1097-1103
[10]  
Jones R(1988)Patient–physician communication: A descriptive summary of the literature Patient Education and Counseling 12 99-119
1234