Strategic marketing ambidexterity: antecedents and financial consequences

被引:0
作者
Brett W. Josephson
Jean L. Johnson
Babu John Mariadoss
机构
[1] George Mason University,Department of Marketing
[2] Washington State University,Department of Marketing and International Business
来源
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | 2016年 / 44卷
关键词
Dynamic capabilities; Ambidexterity; Marketing strategy; Firm risk and return;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Strategic marketing ambidexterity (SMA), the blend of a firm’s exploitation of existing competencies and exploration of future capabilities in strategic marketing activities, represents a dynamic capability that is vital in achieving superior performance. Given its criticality, the authors examine how firm antecedents and industry contexts affect the shift in a firm’s SMA over time (movement in the blend of exploitation and exploration). In addition, the authors examine SMA’s influence on firm financial outcomes, i.e., risk and return. Using data from 1999 to 2011 on publically traded firms, the authors show that firm maturity and slack (financial and strategic) are key determinants of SMA. Specifically, increased firm maturity and strategic slack result in a shift toward exploitation, whereas increased financial slack results in a shift toward exploration. Industry competitiveness moderates these effects. In terms of the financial performance implications of SMA, the authors find that shifts in SMA toward exploitation increase return, but they also increase firm-idiosyncratic risk. The authors conclude with implications for theory and managerial practice.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 554
页数:15
相关论文
共 154 条
[1]  
Agarwal R(2002)Firm and product life cycles and firm survival American Economic Review 92 184-190
[2]  
Gort M(1990)Why do firms reduce business risk? Academy of Management Journal 33 520-533
[3]  
Amit R(1982)Marketing, strategic planning and the theory of the firm Journal of Marketing 46 15-26
[4]  
Wernerfelt B(1984)Stage of the product life cycle, business strategy, and business performance Academy of Management Journal 27 5-24
[5]  
Anderson PF(2009)Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: managing paradoxes of innovation Organization Science 20 696-717
[6]  
Anderson CR(2006)The cross-section of volatility and expected returns Journal of Finance 61 259-299
[7]  
Zeithaml CP(2007)A behavioral theory of the firm—40 years and counting: introduction and impact Organization Science 18 337-349
[8]  
Andriopoulos C(2005)Resolving the capability: rigidity paradox in new product innovation Journal of Marketing 69 61-83
[9]  
Lewis MW(1991)Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage Journal of Management 17 99-120
[10]  
Ang A(1981)On the measurement of organizational slack Academy of Management Review 6 29-39